“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
Military vehicles, bayonets, robots with bombs attached? Sounds legit
to put up there asses you loser
I bet the lady in MO.that was beheaded by a radicalized Muslim just a few years ago would still be alive if she had had a Bayonet, or a gun! He cut off her head because she refused his aggravating her to convert from Christianity to Islam!
For hand to hand fighting that way you can see their face as you gut them or slice them from ear to ear
Then why do you want all the refugees in our country for we need to clean out DC.
Obama is their leader, and he’s a piece of s**t
He’s right about bayonets, and small rural cities don’t need tanks and bomb resistant vehicles. Small rural towns aren’t run by thugs and terrorists. Large cities with urban slums and violent gangs with a tendency to riot might be able to use those armored vehicles.
For the Un people Obama is bringing in
Here we go folks!
Screw him if it saves officers lives.