“I can’t imagine any use for bayonets in an urban setting,” stated Sen. Rand Paul to Senate Homeland Security Committee at a hearing last year.
“I can’t answer what a local police force would use a bayonet for,” Alan Estevez said.
Paul snapped back “None”
Rand Paul is completely correct, of course, that there is no need for bayonets in local law enforcement. Bayonets are for hand-to-hand combat in battle and the only purpose is to kill.
GO TO PAGE 2 FOR MORE + VIDEO:
Rand, why don’t you consult with your father before making those statements ? There is not enough gear or arsenal for any local Law Enforcement, remember, they always put their lives on front to protect us. Please, think twice before making any judgement on local Law Enforcement.
For their safety
For when Obama or Hillary takes away the ammunition.
Maybe they are preparing for a Muslim invasion.
You obviously haven’t walked the streets of Chicago lately.
They Need bayonets to Stab with! only one Reason, 2, Maybe they can cut That round inbound.
Because OBAMA is taking away their bullets??? Going to treat them like Barney Fife.
HAHA! That’s in case you run out of the 1.6 billion rounds of ammo the government has stock piled! LMAOROTF.
No, they don’t think that. Maybe you just figured out why they might need the bayonets, hm?
In what state do you live that makes your register a bayonet? I have one for my rifle!