As the debate over President Trump’s immigration policy and initiatives grows, so does his apparent determination to see his campaign promises put into action. The left, as expected, is in a fit of self-righteous rage over the efforts being made to curtail illegal immigration and remove illegals from the US, especially those who have committed crimes. However, also as expected, Mr. Trump is not backing down in the face of such resistance to the enforcement of the law, but is doubling-down.
The possibility of federal over-reach is a concern, especially in matters of law enforcement. Most crimes are of a local nature, and as such are the proper responsibility of state and local law enforcement. Injecting federal authorities into local matters is seldom a good idea no matter how it appealing it might be at the time. Hence, those who love liberty should be concerned when they see anything that appears to move towards the federalization of the state and local police.
All of this said, we are in anything but a normal environment. Cities and states are in active rebellion against established federal laws regarding immigration, and are harboring illegals in an effort to thwart their deportation. It’s an outrageous situation, so it comes as little surprise that the solution being implemented is somewhat unconventional. More on page two.
Building a border megalopolis in Mexico, fully funded by us for a century could be a compassionate solution to our on going immigration crisis. A 100 year lease of the right Mexican properties would allow deportees to have apartment keys before deportation orders were executed, allowing dignity as some small conciliation, work would also be provided and funded by us for 100 years
. Education, health care. it’s probably some kind of weird socialist arrangement but it’s much more humane. our nation rebuild half of Europe after WW2, we could easily absorb a century of this, considering the problems such an expenditure would straighten out. We certainly should open dozens more immigration offices in the most heavily effected areas, to help them with quicker and more favorable visitations and visa’s, as well as citizenship program assistance.
All politicians engaged in Sanctuary are in violation of existing federal laws. What should a president do when local and state elected officials refuse to follow and enforce laws written by congress? CA just voted to be a sanctuary state. How can a state write a law that violates existing federal law? Federal law should be enforced. Constitution clearly gives the President the power to control all foreigners coming into the US. A federal judge has no jurisdiction to block the President’s decision on this
A solution that again screws taxpayers because spineless politicians refused to create immigration laws that work. Neglected for many years
When states, cities or counties don’t obey laws intended to protect its citizens there is fundamental safety issues for our law enforcement men and woman AND the everyday person.
He’s not smart enough to do anything but mumble his trash talk
Why not deport his stripper. This country was founded by immagrants. What makes his wives any different from any other immagrants. Or his mother who was an immagrant.
pp
Personally I think there aren’t very many good choices. And none that someone won’t whine or complain about. “To serve and protect” that was the motto. Now cities and states are protecting the criminals “illegal aliens”. If they wanted to really be here they would have at least tried for citizenship. Now the victims of crimes are being called criminals
GOOD, whatever it takes to remove every illegal criminal….
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/11/06/melania-trump-reported-customs-immigration-violations.html