Fox News recently exposed the use of a hidden face and license place scanner being used by a Post Office in Denver, CO. One hour after Fox discovered the spy camera it was ripped from the ground.
The cameras, managed by the agencies’ police force, the United States Postal Inspection Service, was discovered by a customer hidden inside a utilities box last November. The camera evidently was in use throughout the Christmas season.
Managers inside the post office tell FOX31 Denver they were unaware customers were being photographed outside and that the surveillance was not part of the building’s security monitoring.
A spokesperson for Postal Inspection Service declined to address the specific reason for the domestic surveillance, but admitted the agency had a “number of cameras at their disposal.”
Pamela Durkee, a Federal Law Enforcement Agent and U.S. Postal Inspector, sent an email to FOX31 Denver explaining, “(We) do not engage in routine or random surveillance. Cameras are deployed for law enforcement or security purposes, which may include the security of our facilities, the safety of our customers and employees, or for criminal investigations. Employees of the Postal Inspection Service are sworn to uphold the United States Constitution, including protecting the privacy of the American public.”
FOX31 Denver reviewed criminal search warrants on file in city, county, and federal court but none appeared to be related to the Golden post office camera set-up. The Postal Inspection Service would not confirm or deny that the camera was collecting data for a specific case or cases.
Lee Tien, an attorney for the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation, says more and more federal agencies are getting away with conducting surveillance and collecting personal data of citizens without a warrant signed by a judge.
“Part of being a responsible, constitutional government is explaining why it is doing surveillance on its citizens,” Lee told Halsne. “The government should not be collecting this kind of sensitive information. And it is sensitive! It`s about your relationships, your associations with other people, which can be friendship or political or religious. The idea that we give up that privacy simply because we use the U.S. mail is, I think, a silly idea.”
Lee says EFF has been fighting for greater government transparency when it comes to the way agencies like the FBI and the National Security Agency have been vacuuming up massive amounts of cell phone, email and license plates data and storing them in a central computer system.
Lee says, “The idea that they would be able to keep that information forever and search through it whenever they want to – that seems very, very wrong to us because it means you’ll be able to accumulate over time a lot of innocent peoples’ information and then use it in the kinds of ways that would not be overseen by any kind of court or independent third party.”
FOX31 Denver filed multiple Freedom of Information Act requests with the Postal Service, Postal Inspection Service, and Office of the Inspector General in an attempt to identify the cost and scope of the Postal Inspection Service surveillance program.
None of the agencies could provide a written data retention policy, which would detail how long USPIS could keep the images agents have been collecting from the Golden post office camera and other cameras around the Denver area. Similarly, there does not appear to be a policy regarding in what circumstances other federal agencies may have access to the personal information gathered from the cameras.
Our discovery of this camera program comes just months after the U.S. Postal Service was forced to reveal (during a Congressional hearing) that it was videotaping and storing the address and return information from billions of pieces of mail at its distribution centers.
A federal audit in 2014 found that the Post Office had “insufficient” controls in place when allowing law enforcement agencies access to the data collected from that “mail cover” program.
We did locate a California company which claims it sold the U.S. Postal Service “consumer surveillance systems,” which come installed with wireless data retrieval and infrared night capabilities.
Hop-On Incorporated did not return our repeated calls to elaborate on its self-proclaimed deal. Our FOIA requests for federal contracts and financial information about Hop-On and other contractors who sell USPS and USPIS camera equipment were returned to us void of all information.
Wrong. See my post below..
Actually, in your car you do have a reasonable expectation of privacy same as your home. Surveillance is one thing in public. Using recognition software is entirely different. You may not care about your 4th Amendment rights but don’t tell others what to do with theirs.
This “tool” isn’t preventing anything.
Just fyi, the usps uses cameras to watch their own employees they think might be stealing mail. Not customers.
Marijuana sales…..duh!
There is no expectation of privacy in public spaces. Take your business to fed ex if you don’t want to be recorded!
The standard of privacy is whether a person would reasonably think they could be seen by many people without extraordinary effort (peeking through a crack in a wall or blinds would be extraordinary). Whether in your car or not, does not matter. And using facial recognition is not different, it is the police making good use of technology. I can’t wait for the anti-police crowd to respond when departments begin running body can cottage through an I’d system!
Wake up people Rand Paul can’t do $#%&!@* the Illuminati with squash him like a bug America will fall like the Roman empire Hillary Rodham Clinton will be the next president Republicans can’t do anything so many people have sold there selfs to Satan for Greed wealth Power
It is time to reign in government and stop the police state we have allowed them to become. No more! We must demand that it stop now. This should be the topic by which any Presidential candidate must be judged for electability
And we should care about this….WHY?!
If you’re not a criminal you got nothing to worry about.
I’m sure the Jews in Europe said the same thing at one time. What is legal one day can change the next. How much is this program costing the tax payer. What are the benefits. How many convictions were a result of this program. Is it a cost effective way of stopping criminals or is it just another grab for information on law abiding citizens. These are all questions that should be answered. Especially when as tax payers we are paying for these programs.
good job!!! enough over reaching by the government!!!!