According to a recent poll conducted by the University of Texas and the Texas Tribune, the majority of Texas residents believe that the federal government is planning to arrest political dissentnents during a “domestic military intervention.”
One striking result from the poll was the reasons respondents thought the federal government would intervene.
“You put federal government into it and people’s skepticism and their concern really rises,” said Daron Shaw, a professor at UT-Austin.
“It cuts into everybody’s suspicion,” Shaw stated. “Nobody trusts the federal government. About a third of Democrats are concerned about the government going nuts. Among Republicans, it’s between 55 percent and two-thirds.”
Graphs and surprising poll results over on PAGE 2:
Academi signs contracts not oaths.
I woyld be more concerned with the “Corporate” armies than the U.S. military.Blackwater /Academi, Wackenhut , etc.the “subcontractors” are not bound by the same rules.
Soon . . . GOOGLE /DARPA will be the concern
Renenber Obama promised a Federal Police more powerful than the Military. With Civil Unrest Obama can declare Martial Law and stay in power. Obama is Muslim Brotherhood, READ proof,http://theamericanreport.org/the-betrayal-papers/
I really think the military is against obummer
Because when asked, they said No, they could not fire upon citizens.
Just as Cubit corp./Abraxasas is monitoring internet via tripwire . . .its always the “subcontractors”.
Stupid can’t be fixed.
If this true a lot of good American lives will lost.
The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, both Socialist Democrats, that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of “a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty”
The two stated that many Americans who were eligible for welfare were not receiving benefits, and that a welfare enrollment drive would strain local budgets, precipitating a crisis at the state and local levels that would be a wake-up call for the federal government, particularly the Democratic Party.
There would also be side consequences of this strategy, according to Cloward and Piven. These would include: easing the plight of the poor in the short-term (through their participation in the welfare system); ****shoring up support for the national Democratic Party then-splintered by pluralistic interests *****(through its cultivation of poor and minority cons$#%&!@*uencies by implementing a national “solution” to poverty); and relieving local governments of the financially and politically onerous burdens of public welfare (through a national “solution” to poverty)
texas isnt alone in looking for this i think most of the south is expecting an attempt