Polish European Parliament Deputy Calls for Europe to Ban All Muslim Immigration

Is the U.S. learning and how does U.S. immigration policy compare to Polish vetting procedures?

Ryszard Czarnecki, Polish European Parliament deputy is proud of his country for banning Muslim immigration.

“We, Poland, are learning from the mistakes of others … and we will not open our doors to Islamic migrants,” he added.

Czarnecki advised Britain to remove “radical migrants”, saying: “If a radical Muslim leader calls his brothers-in-faith at the mosque … to fight with the unfaithful then I believe there are grounds to expel that Imam”.

Who do you think ISIS is more likely to train, children of Muslim immigrants raised in the West or youth in their own countries? According to Czarnecki, it’s more likely to be the former.

Czarnecki, who hails from Poland’s conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party, said terrorist attacks were often carried out by children of “Islamic migrants” – many of them citizens of European countries – who were trained by the so-called Islamic State.

“Other countries have led to a situation in which those trained on Islamic State territory in Syria, Iraq – young people with French, Belgian, Dutch, British, German citizenship – return to Europe … and somehow [the authorities] were incapable of monitoring them,” Czarnecki said.

Czarnecki believes banning Muslim immigration is non-negotiable for any country serious about reducing terror attacks.

The only way to protect Poland from terrorist attacks is by not allowing Islamic migrants into the country, Polish European Parliament deputy Ryszard Czarnecki has said.

Banning Muslim immigration has been effective for reducing terror threats. This piece of information is so shocking to those on the left many refuse to discuss as speaking of successful Muslim Ban would be endorsing hate speech. In other words, there is no liberal rebuttal to the hard facts on the exponential national security increases seen from banning all Muslim immigration. Poland now has one of the lowest terror threats in the world.  That is the one thing countries banning Muslim immigration all have in common.

How many terror attacks have you heard about in the news involving Japan? They banned Muslim immigration a long time ago. Furthermore, they reject 99% of all refugee applications. In 2016, only 28 people were approved out of 10,901 applicants and required to undergo months long training on Japanese culture and language prior to officially receiving papers. It is also interesting to note that Japan is the only G7 nation not struggling to contain radical terrorism and economically prospering.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees continually berates Japan for their permanent ban on Muslim refugees. But, they don’t care and why would they as they’re unapologetic in their quest to put Japan first.

Heinz-Christian Strache, leader of the Austrian Freedom Party is also advocating his countrymen to follow Poland’s example and ban Muslim immigration. Strache clearly explains in interviews how Islam is incompatible with gender equality, and the prevention of terrorism.

Dutch politician, Machiel de Graaf echoes Poland’s approach to Muslim immigration. Except he takes it a step father. Graaf makes a convincing yet controversial and perhaps ill-advised political argument for shutting down all Mosques and banning Islam in the West.

They’re 65 million refuges in the world. Only 4.8 million are from Syria and reflect percentages from permanently Muslim countries. They’re an infinite number of refugees the West could be helping.

Why are those on the left so opposed to putting a hold on Muslim immigration until the terror threat is lowered?

Source: The News, The Independent, The Telegraph,

Image: European Parliament