The Third Amendment was created to protect your home from being quartered by soldiers without your consent. It has very rarely been a matter of debate or litigation, until now.
Federal district court Judge Andrew Gordon ruled that the police are exempt from the 3rd Amendment with a case out of Henderson, Nevada after a family had their home broken into and seized by local law enforcement who stated they needed the home to gain a “tactical advantage” against suspected criminals in a neighboring house.
Police actually forced their way into this family’s home, pepper-balled the father and his dog and then incarcerated the man for a day.
MOVE TO THE NEXT PAGE:
Yes but not true F**e news only if they have a warrant So chill
Good luck, u will be shot to death.
Dodge not true the picture is old and it was a case of a crime committed in the house
If this was true why they don’t raid the houses of radicals
Allan stark please be real this is a. Old picture you are another snowflake who talks without seeing the facts no one enters anybody house without warrant except illigals and the idiot that enter my house to robbed my jewelry
Why is so many ignorant comments wow amazing how many people opinionated. This happens maybe 10 to 15 years ago when a crime was committed in the house
Mara Planer The issue in question was not the dubious actions of the cops, but the judges ruling concerning it.
Learn to read more carefully.
I am sure that is not exactly what the judge said and just someone else’s interpretation of it to rile everyone up.
Ummm…no
#ReplaceActivistJudges