
House Minority Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi is losing her mind. This statement is not designed to be hateful or slanderous. These are just her own words being reported.
Pelosi gave a cringe-inducing interview Friday with MSNBC. Crude words, ignorance, and self-humiliation took this exchange to a whole new level. One obvious conclusion emerged. Pelosi believes in evolutionary racism. You remember the old way scientists determined the Negro race was inferior by measuring skulls and proclaiming Negroes were closer to apes while whites a higher evolved species? This same old racist theory can also be pulled out of an elderly buttock and used by a senile old lady to explain why half the country is animals.
It would be charitable to imagine she thought she was a cartoonish figure and playing the role of a witch or evil stepmother in a fairy tale. Then maybe it would make sense why she thought she was living in a kingdom, not a democracy and why half the land is talking animals. But, alas it is instead merely that Pelosi has at last cracked under the pressures of Trump Hysteria and revealing her true viewpoints.
What brought up the topic of talking animals? Hillary tasked Pelosi with renaming her “basket of deplorables” and apparently imagination or original thought is something of a commodity over there in the snow filled Liberal Kingdom fighting the siege of reality.
Pelosi’s theory as to why Trump supporters are primates and how thoughts of Trump, not sleeping keeps HER up at night on the next page
remove this stupid$#%&!@*.its very obvious she is ill..dementia
you are a very disgusting woman with no morals at all
its dare not dear
Yes Nancy we were voting for the way of our constitution and against the war you’re waging on it!
F**e brain!
Neither party has particularly good congressional leadership at the moment.
Term Limits – Congress is not a retirement home – leave
here’s the thing with facts… we all interpret them differently by our own perspective and we tend to line up facts to support our own beliefs. for example:
facts are:
!) my brother in law is a lighter thief in that he forgets and by habit
and automatically puts a borrowed lighter in his pocket.
2) said BIL visits for the afternoon and proceeds to borrow lighters for his smokes
3) when BIL leaves, I am now missing 3 lighters and can’t find them
4) logical conclusion is said BIL stole my lighters
seemed logical and pretty tight facts about the situation. but i was wrong and had simply misplaced them in the hub-bub of company.
that was a way simplified example but the same issue exists. we never have ALL the facts and even if we did, we are bound by our own beliefs and thinking process and lack true objectivity.
with that said.. i am constantly amazed how we can all look at the same “facts” and have completely different conclusions. Brenda, you and I have the same beliefs and perspective and therefore come to the same conclusions. and yet others of different beliefs and a different perspective come to totally different conclusions that we cannot fathom just as they cannot fathom ours. and then there is were the discourse begins…..
What a pos
Wonder what she thinks killery voters where thinking