Speaker of the House Paul Ryan stunned conservatives in an interview with Sean Hannity. Asked by Hannity about the hordes of Muslim refugees trying to enter the country, Ryan refused to lend his support to efforts to investigate incoming migrants’ beliefs before letting them in, stating “that’s not who we are.”
By remarkable coincidence, this exact same phrase was uttered by President Obama when he criticized Republican pushes to more carefully vet Syrian immigrants, effectively putting Ryan in the same side of the ring as the president and the Democratic party.
On top of that, Ryan’s response ran in complete contradiction to the opinions of Senate Immigration Subcommittee Chairman Jeff Sessions (R-AL), who is referenced by Hannity in their discussion. A longtime analyst of immigration trends and effects, Sessions has concluded that the rate of immigrants coming into the US must be decreased, noting that a staggering “Eighty-three percent of voters want to see projected immigration growth reduced.”
Turn to the next page to learn about Ryan’s pro-immigration rhetoric:
mayunn this piece of work been in the koolaide cellar with Obama again … showing his true colors
McCarthy explained:
Under federal law, the executive branch is expressly required to take religion into account in determining who is granted asylum. Under the provision governing asylum (section 1158 of Title 8, U.S. Code), an alien applying for admission must establish that … religion [among other things] … was or will be at least one central reason for persecuting the applicant. Moreover, to qualify for asylum in the United States, the applicant must be a “refugee” as defined by federal law. That definition (set forth in Section 1101(a)(42)(A) of Title , U.S. Code) also requires the executive branch to take account of the alien’s religion: The term “refugee” means (A) any person who is outside any country of such person’s nationality … and who is unable or unwilling to return to … that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of … religion [among other things] …[.] The law requires a “religious test… it is downright dishonest to claim that taking such religious distinctions into account is “not American”… How can something American law requires be “not American”?
– See more at: http://www.teaparty.org/paul-ryan-tells-sean-hannity-will-support-cuts-muslim-immigration-thats-130517/#sthash.s1bXq3el.dpuf
Another Balliss politician .what next in Gov.
Just like obama….
Why do we keep replacing one idiot with another.
Well Paul apparently it is who we are. That’s the reason you did not get the nomination to run for President and Trump did. While we don’t object to legal immigration, it must be controlled and it must be legal. Thanks to the liberals, and the RINO’s like you, McCain, Rubio, and scores of others, we are being overrun with the criminal element from other nations. They are disease ridden, and they pose a threat to us and our families. That doesn’t even take in to consideration the Islamic invading army being brought in by Obama, and no doubt will continue should Hillary win. We have had if. If we can’t get legal representation in our government eventually the people will take it upon themselves to enforce the laws and our constitution.
That may not be who he is but when it comes to protecting my family that’s exactly who I am
Ryan: Pay attention, you’re done. We aren’t Voting you in any more. Pack your bags.
YOU BETTER START LOOKING FOR A NEW JOB—
That’s right let isis in isn’t that what Obama has been working for. Idiots