Gun owners in Palm Springs should take note that their city council has introduced a number of onerous new restrictions on firearm possession and storage.
Keeping in line with the radical liberal politics so endemic to the state, council members for the southern Californian city voted to mandate that guns in Palm Springs homes either be kept in a secure location or disabled with a locking device. In addition, the laws require that citizens report the stolen The measure passed in a narrow vote of 3 to 2, reflecting the public’s ambiguous feelings about the measure.
Also demonstrating the relative unpopularity of the new gun control laws were 15 residents who turned out to speak against the proposed rules. In contrast, only 8 people, among them an activist for Moms Demand Action, spoke out in support of the measures. How fitting that the city council chose to ignore the will of the majority in order to push through a small but vocal minority’s anti-gun agenda.
Learn more on the next page:
I wouldn’t if it’s my house.
Don’t think so who gives a$#%&!@*i don’t
BETTER IDEA LEAVE YOUR GUNS AT YOU LOCAL POLICE STATION. WHEN AND IF SOME PERSON IS BREAKING IN TO YOUR HOME . YOU THEN CALL YOUR POLICE STATIONS TO PLEASE DELIVER YOUR WEAPON YOU ARE BEING ROB..
This kind of defeats the whole idea of being able to defend yourself against home invaders, doesn’t it?
May as well take the battery out of your smoke detectors too.
What happened to self defense?
If someone come in my home my guns won’t be disable!!
While I disagree with the this being law. I’m also guilty of hypocrisy. In that all to fire any of my guns except my Dailey ccw I would need 3 keys. one for the gun case one for the trigger one for the ammunition. My ccw is only protected by one lock when I’m not carrying it. But it should be my right to choose to or not to lock them like that
Yea—-right!
This was already ruled on by the supreme court as unconstitutional