Liberal philosophy says that the feelings of one student out of one hundred are more important than the well-being and success of the other 99 students — so long as that one student is an “aggrieved minority.” Recently, this philosophy was on display front and center in Alaska at the state track meet.
High school girls in Alaska are crying foul after a male sprinter took home all-state honors in girls’ track and field. According to local reports, it was the first time in Alaskan history that a male athlete competed in the girls’ state championships.
Haines senior Nattaphon Wangyot–who self-identifies as a girl–advanced to the state finals in the 100-meter and 200-meter events. He won fifth place in the 100-meter dash and third place in the 200-meter. In both events, he competed against girls as young as ninth grade.
One of the girls Wangyot beat out for a slot at the state meet, Hutchison runner Emma Daniels, took issue with allowing a male athlete to compete in girls events.
“I’m glad that this person is comfortable with who they are and they’re able to be happy in who they are, but I don’t think it’s competitively completely 100-percent fair,” she told a local CBS station.
Another runner, Peyton Young (who competed in a different event) took a similar position. “I don’t know what’s politically correct to say, but in my opinion your gender is what you’re born with,” she told the Alaska Dispatch News.
“It’s the DNA. Genetically a guy has more muscle mass than a girl, and if he’s racing against a girl, he may have an advantage.”
Liberals — who so often love to accuse conservatives of being “anti-science” — appear to be struggling mightily with the fact that men simply have anatomical advantages over women in most physical competition, but don’t expect the mainstream media to report on this hypocrisy anytime soon.
Source: The Daily Caller
fcking freaks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
…does he go in the women’s locker room?…
girls only