In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Will honey what going from the left with Trump is those people our against our Constitution.and they want one world government and sharia law ,so we the people need to wake up.
Insanity!!!!!
There is a Judge who needs to be removed for ordering against the Constitution and the rights of the defendent to refer to it. Proof, liberal judges are not honest or truthful individuals and do not deserve the position they hold.
What
That’s not in his jurisdiction power.
Pardon me?!
Drain the swamp
It’s the foundation of our legal system.
Moronic
What has happened to AMERICAN VALUES. WE USED TO HOLD OUR CONSTITUTION WITH THE HIGHEST REGARDS. Judges that do not go by American should loose their bench
DE BENCH JUDGE