In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Remove this judge
Well, the “Ohio Judge” needs to go bye-bye!
The defendant has a right to know what portion of the constitution he is violating and then defend himself. That judge needs to be removed from the bench and institutionalized.
You can’t POSSIBLY believe this pile of horse$#%&!@*is true…..
I think that is unconstitutional!
Idiot
DISBAR THIS$#%&!@*NOW.
SAY WHAT?? The Constitution is our law, where our rights come .from. Remove this Judge today take their Law License .
If that is true then your court is not a court of law !!!
What?