In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Drain the judicial swamp
Most Liberal Judges don’t like to hear the Constitution. They like to write their own
Oh really? How’s that working out in “the people’s” court you$#%&!@*
Dump this idiot any of us could do better.
This is the reason our judicial system is so screwed up. We have utter morons as judges. This one in particular is on the top of the moron list. She just told the defendant that he couldn’t use the law to defend himself. She should be disbarred and committed to the nearest asylum for observation.
Disrobe that asswipe.
These judges that are taking this kind of ruling should be removed from the bench!
Not long before Patriots have a price on her , this is America , we live and die by that constitution !!!
This Guy Needs to be FIRED!!!!
These judges need to be replaced!!!