In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
ONE LITTLE BITE OF THE ANTI–CONSTITUTION PIE AT A TIME .!!!!! TO CHANGE A CULTURE YOU MUST FIRST CHANGE THE MIND SET. SOCIALISM 101. !!!!!!!
Judge needs to replaced
Sounds like the judge needs to be disbarred
She needs to be disbarred
This Ohio judge should be absolutely debarred t
And debenched
The constitution is the base law in this country.
That judge does not have that attoritity
Really, crazy person
How can you be found guilty of something u are not even allowed to mention
What people don’t realize is that the BAR itself is unconstitutional, look it up