In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Time to contact the Ohio bar association !!
This is another judge who is headed for the waste basket.
Another Kangaroo court.
Chrissie Hynde was right…where has my state gone?
Just how many of these idiot judges do we have in this country?
hate tell our law are surrounded by the constitution. They discover bar that judge
That core of our freedom.,they need get hold of Jay Skelton he a Christian lawyer fight for our rights.
Constitution right he a attorney fight for our Constitution in america
What another Obama appointy.
We need to get rid of a lot of UNCONSTITUTIONAL judges, one way or another.