In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
DID YOU ever here the word your fired because that’s what should be done if it’s true with out question
Get rid of that POS!
This idiot judge needs to be kicked off the bench and have his law license removed!
Then she shouldn’t be a judge
And these idiots run our country!!!
Ridiculous! And this is home!
She needs banned from any court, unless being accused of a crime…
Definitely campaigning against this idiot next election. As my hometown goes a little farther down the drain. SMH
well if she dont belive in it then she/needs to get the$#%&!@*out period
Must be a Libtard !