In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
Well we can cut out. The Honorable part of calling them. Your Honor ,, because there doesn,t seem to be any Honor in our Judges anymore!!
THIS WORLD IS SO TAINTED..a nation of sin is what it has become.
Then he is a worthless judge needs to be the best
Virgil is an idiot
Ban the judge
Judges who make their own laws must be eliminated!!!!
How do they claim to be judges
Oh brother
If mentioning the Constitution might confuse jurors, maybe a different panel should be selected–made up of people who were home-schooled instead of being indoctrinated by the public school system.
Impeach the judge.