In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
The defendant can legally ask the judge to be removed as this violates his rights. You can’t “ban” the law while in court.
You know that is f**e
Remove him from office.
Whoa
He is not fulfilling his VOW. ..
HIRED IDIOTS EVERYWHERE!
well then he must ban the mentioning of anything to do with the law. does the judge not know that the constitution gives us our laws.
She doesn’t need to be a judge on any court.
BS
Agree–Judicial lunacy!!!!