In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
I agree, going into the booth, people know the politicians they will vote for, the judges, they often do little campaigning and the voters have no idea of their philosophies .
Impeach this clown for violating his oath of office!
Disbar him.
Need to remove ant judge from his position that refuses to follow our constitution/bill of rights and our laws
OmG
OUTRAGEOUS AND UNACCEPTABLE
Your Fired,pick which country you wish to be deported to.
Um, judges can’t make laws they can only follow the law as stated in the constitution! Period!
WTF????????????
Just one more judge that does not have to be obeyed