In a recent pre-trial hearing in Xenia, Ohio, a judge agreed with a prosecutor’s motion to prohibit the defendant from mentioning the Constitution or the constitutionality of the law he was charged with violating.
Judge Catherine Barber stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” to the defendant, Virgil Vaduva.
The prosecutor made the claim that mentioning the Constitution “will confuse the jury,” to which Vaduva replied that uttering words on a public sidewalk, his panhandling charge, constitutes free speech.
MOVE TO PAGE 2:
The judge is a democrat no doubt.
Pin head take her off the bench
World government is starting. Big money and democrats want this.
Everybody gets off then?
that is not right
FIND THE COURT ADDRESS, AND SEND HER COPIES OF THE CONSTITUTION
To be referred to from this point forward as “the document that cannot be named”, otherwise known as the “Voldemort of Court”.
Another one needs to go
Then he doesn’t belong on the bench
This is an old article. Published at least 2yrs ago.