Barack Obama responds like a whiny, pouty little kid when anyone calls him out on his attempts to rule the country, and he is certainly willing to lie and misrepresent the facts when confronted. And so it is in the video on the next page where he is asked by a man in a town-hall type setting why he is so intent on creating new gun laws and restrictions, and why he can’t see that such restrictions in Obama’s hometown of Chicago are not working.
The man says nothing about about Obama trying to confiscate guns, but that is the first thing Obama boo-hoos about, insisting he does not want to confiscate guns, though there is ample evidence that many of his policies would make it difficult or impossible for citizens to own guns.
See the video of Obama twisting the question to pretend his gun control efforts are simply for public safety on page 2;
I just love to watch him squirm
Gun ownership and the 2nd amendment are a right….. Not something government has authority to regulate. His comparison to a car and license is just ridiculous.
Is looking at an ISIL website a crime? If it’s not, why are people who do put on a no fly list? If it is a crime, then why aren’t charges made? Seems to me that people are being punished without due proces. No matter how convincingly he states it, I don’t trust these people. And for all his BS! Hillary said, make no mistake, I’m coming for your guns….sounds convincing to me.
The problem is your a liar and if we allow you to even peak in the door you will kick it open and barge on in.
Here’s the problem with your argument Mr. President. More gun laws do nothing to stop the criminal from getting guns because they don’t obey gun laws. They can get guns quickly just like they can buy drugs that law abiding citizens cannot get unless they want to break the law. So we now know that the criminal has the advantage because they can get guns and carry them very quickly while law abiding citizens are being infringed on and have to go unprotected while they wait months and even years before they can buy a gun in some states that are infringing on their 2nd amendment rights. While they wait the criminal has their guns and the good guys life is in danger. It’s better that a bad person gets a gun legally and easily then one good person has to wait when you don’t know if they might need that gun tomorrow to protect themselves. If a good person gets harmed because their 2nd amendment rights were infringed on then they should have the right to sue the government for obstructing their right to buy a gun for protection. Shall not be infringed on is clear.
Bob, you’re a traitor
Linda Peters You disagree? why?
WRONG…MASS KILLINGS ARE COMMITTED BY PEOPLE WHO WERE ALREADY CRIMINALS AND OR HAD SEVERE MENTAL PROBLEMS (IE EXTREME BELIEF SYSTEMS)
Thats not illegal.
WOW andrew read a book