Preventing terrorists from entering the US has gotten harder for law enforcement thanks to the efforts of the Obama administration.
In spite of attempts by agents screening Syrian refugees seeking permission to enter the country, the administration has explicitly prohibited them from asking Syrians about their religious beliefs, opinions, and associations. This in spite of the fact that ISIS and other terrorist groups have publicly declared their desire to infiltrate Western countries by sneaking in alongside migrants.
Yet incredibly, the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI have implemented a policy that effectively prevents it’s officers from weeding out such individuals.
Even when a refugee has expressed support for such terrorist figures as the infamous American-born Al Qaeda propagandist Anwar Al-Awlaki, US officials are barred from inquiring about such affinities and sympathies. This was seen in the investigation of Nidal Hassan, perpetrator of the 2009 Ford Hood shooting, when the FBI dismissed his email correspondence with Awlaki as “not pertinent.”
Learn more about this insane policy at the link below:
He is highly offending me and a million other Americans
He is NOT a Christian , ,,,if he is, so is the oak tree in my yard
Wrath of God is coming anyway,,Obama is just helping to bring it on us sooner
Send these warriors to Boot Camp, then right back to fight for Democracy. Just like my daddy in 1941! Pledge alliance first!
Roflmbo..a good muslim……ahahahaha
Ignorant idiot!!
Send all these young men back to fight for their country
Kafirs, Dhimmis and believers
Excepted from “The Hadith” (A Taste of Islam) (book 5)
Unbeliever is a neutral term. The Koran defines the Kafir and Kafir is not a neutral word. A Kafir is not merely someone who does not agree with Islam, but a Kafir is evil, disgusting, the lowest form of life. Kafirs can be tortured, killed, lied to and cheated. So the usual word “unbeliever” does not reflect the political reality of Islam. The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse.
The word (Kafir) is usually translated as “unbeliever” but this translation is wrong. The word “unbeliever” is logically and emotionally neutral, whereas, Kafir is the most abusive, prejudiced and hateful word in any language.
There are many religious names for Kafirs: polytheists, idolaters, People of the Book (Christians and Jews), Buddhists, atheists, agnostics, and pagans. Kafir covers them all, because no matter what the religious name is, they can all be treated the same. What Mohammed said and did to polytheists can be done to any other category of Kafir.
Islam devotes a great amount of energy to the Kafir[1]. The majority (64%) of the Koran is devoted to the Kafir, and nearly all of the Sira (81%) deals with Mohammed’s struggle with them. The Hadith (Traditions) devotes 32% of the text to Kafirs. Overall, the Trilogy devotes 60% of its content to the Kafir.
Here are a few of the Koran references:
A Kafir can be beheaded—47: 4 When you encounter the Kafirs on the battlefield, cut off their heads until you have thoroughly defeated them and then take the prisoners and tie them up firmly.
A Kafir can be plotted against—86: 15 They plot and scheme against you [Mohammed], and I plot and scheme against them. Therefore, deal calmly with the Kafirs and leave them alone for a while.
A Kafir can be terrorized—8: 12 Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, “I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the Kafirs’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!”
A Muslim is not the friend of a Kafir—3: 28 Believers should not take Kafirs as friends in preference to other believers. Those who do this will have none of Allah’s protection and will only have themselves as guards. Allah warns you to fear Him for all will return to Him.
A Kafir is cursed—33: 60 They [Kafirs] will be cursed, and wherever they are found, they will be seized and murdered. It was Allah’s same practice with those who came before them, and you will find no change in Allah’s ways.
KAFIRS AND PEOPLE OF THE BOOK
Muslims tell Christians and Jews that they are special. They are “People of the Book”and are brothers in the Abrahamic faith.
But in Islam you are a Christian, if and only if, you believe that Christ was a man who was a prophet of Allah; there is no Trinity; Jesus was not crucified nor resurrected and that He will return to establish Sharia law.
To be a true Jew you must believe that Mohammed is the last in the line of Jewish prophets.
This verse is positive: 5: 77 Say: Oh, People of the Book, do not step out of the bounds of truth in your religion, and do not follow the desires of those who have gone wrong and led many astray. They have themselves gone astray from the even way.
Islamic doctrine is dualistic, so there is an opposite view as well. Here is the last verse written about the People of the Book (A later verse abrogates or replaces an earlier verse. See page 26.).
This is the final word. It calls for Muslims to make war on the People of the Book who do not believe in the religion of truth, Islam.
9: 29 Make war on those who have received the Scriptures [Jews and Christians] but do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day. They do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden. The Christians and Jews do not follow the religion of truth until they submit and pay the poll tax [jizya] and they are humiliated.
The sentence “They do not forbid…”means that they do not accept Sharia law; “until they submit” means to submit to Sharia law.
Christians and Jews who do not accept Mohammed as the final prophet are Kafirs.
In Islam, Christians and Jews are infidels and “People of the Book”; Hindus are polytheists and pagans. The terms infidel, People of the Book, pagan and polytheist are religious words.
Only the word “Kafir” shows the common political treatment of the Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, animist, atheist and humanist. What is done to a pagan can be done to a Jew or any other Kafir.
It is simple. If you don’t believe that Mohammed is the prophet of Allah, then you are a Kafir.
Unbeliever or non-Muslim are neutral terms, but Kafir is not a neutral word. Instead, it is extremely bigoted and biased.
THE THREE VIEWS OF ISLAM
There are three points of view in dealing with Islam. The point of view depends upon how you feel about Mohammed. If you believe Mohammed is the prophet of Allah, then you are a believer. If you don’t, you are a Kafir. The third viewpoint is that of a dhimmi, a Kafir who is an apologist for Islam.
Dhimmis do not believe that Mohammed was a prophet, but they never say anything that would displease a Muslim. Dhimmis never offend Islam and condemn any analysis that is critical of Islam as being biased.
Let us give an example of the three points of view. In Medina, Mohammed sat all day long beside his 12-year-old wife while they watched as the heads of 800 Jews were removed by sword.[2] Their heads were cut off because they had said that Mohammed was not the prophet of Allah.
Muslims view these deaths as necessary because denying Mohammed’s prophet-hood was an offense against Islam and beheading is the accepted method of punishment, sanctioned by Allah.
Kafirs look at this event as proof of the jihadic violence of Islam and as an evil act. They call it ethnic cleansing.
Apologists (dhimmis) say that this was a historic event, that all cultures have violence in their past, and that no judgment should be passed. They ignore the Islamic belief that the Sunna, Mohammed’s words and deeds in the past, is the perfect model for today and tomorrow and forever.
They (apologists=dhimmis) ignore the fact that this past event of the beheading of 800 Jewish men continues to be acceptable in the present and the future, thus the fate of Daniel Pearl (a reporter who was beheaded on camera).
According to the different points of view, killing the 800 Jews was either evil, a perfect godly act or only another historical event, take your pick.
Only a Muslim cares about the religion of Islam, but all Kafirs are affected by Islam’s political views.
Notice that there is no right and wrong here, merely different points of view that cannot be reconciled. There is no possible resolution between the view of the Kafir and the Muslim.
The apologist tries to bring about a bridge building compromise, but it is not logically possible.
[1] http://cspipublishing.com/statistical/TrilogyStats/AmtTxtDevotedKafir.html
[2] The Life of Muhammad, A. Guillaume, Oxford University Press, 1982, pg. 464.
WD6A-Posted from WordPress for Android
The question would too pertinent to the well being of Americans which is not pertinent at all to him.
He needs to be arrested for treason!