Ah, but the president has plans on unilaterally giving banks cover to allow use of credit cards, which already is supposed to be happening but is not because banks have been cautious. Don’t worry, he’ll have the IRS order them to comply.
While American Express and MasterCard announced they would allow their cards to be used on the island, no Cuban bank has authorization, meaning those traveling from America must still pay in cash. And legally one cannot spend American dollars there.
Hot Air notes that a bill was introduced in Congress earlier this year to lift the travel embargo but has yet to move through committee. Thank you, Congress.
The State Department lists many of these restrictions on their travel web site and they are formidable. The Treasury Department reminds people that spending American money in Cuba as a tourist can result in up to a $65,000 fine. That is called cash.
Obama has hit a real snag. Only Congress can end a trade embargo, which is enshrined into law. But according to White House officials, the President can ease certain restrictions under his executive authority.
The whole story is here.
Yes, Obama has been exposed in another significant overreach of executive power. Let’s see if Congress has the backbone to stop him this time.
narcissistic dictator that Congress is afraid of. Time to clean house. Term limits are a must and treasonous politicians need to be jailed. Obama first and go down the line.
Cuba would be a good place for Oblahma to go live (preferably Gitmo) since KENYA doesn’t want him
Obama feels that everyone is en$#%&!@*led to his opinion.
We elected this new congress in order to fight Obama so they need to start fighting!
A 2014 study reveals Obama has broken upwards of 2000 laws since 2012 alone
– and due to a loophole in the system neither Congress nor or our judiciary branch can do anything about it.
When our president publishes a regulation it is supposed to be looked over by Congress to be validated or not. But because Obama has simply not submitted his published regulations to Congress since the beginning of 2012, anything he’s published can’t be reviewed. Add to that the fact that Congress has barred judicial review of these regulations and you have a president that simply publishes what he wants without oversight.
The situation illustrates the obscure, byzantine process used to create federal regulations — and how easily it can go awry.
“It’s pretty apparent that the system is broken,” said Curtis Copeland, a retired Congressional Research Service staffer who discovered the issue. “It would seem this is one area where congressional Republicans and Democrats could get together and say: ‘This is crazy. We can fix this.’ ”
Under a 1996 statute, most federal rules are supposed to be reported to the House and Senate in paper form and to the Government Accountability Office electronically. But since the start of 2012, that hasn’t happened for many of the regulations put out by the Obama administration, either because of bureaucratic oversight or because they were considered too minor to be reported.
Failing to report many of the rules is a “technical violation” of the statute, “and the law says they can’t take effect,” according to Robert Cramer, the GAO’s managing $#%&!@*ociate general counsel.
But there’s another catch: Congress also barred such rules from judicial review. Two federal appeals courts and two district courts have upheld this principle even when the regulation in question was not submitted to Congress as required. Since Congress cannot p$#%&!@* a resolution of disapproval for a rule until it receives it, this means neither lawmakers nor the courts can step in and demand that agencies submit the required paperwork.
The 1996 law at the center of this mess is the Congressional Review Act, or CRA, which added requirements for reporting most administrative rules to Congress. The idea — stemming from the Republican Party’s “Contract With America” — was that lawmakers would have a chance to overturn any pending regulations they didn’t like before they took effect.
But Congress has only set aside one rule in the 18 years since, and bureaucrats and some lawmakers say the law has evolved into a major h$#%&!@*le. In addition to copies of each rule, agencies are supposed to provide a “concise general statement relating to the rule” and the rule’s effective date, all to be distributed to relevant committees. It’s also not entirely clear which rules need to be reported.
In 2009, the House parliamentarian complained that the law had more than doubled the number of committee referrals it had to send out. “This flow of paper poses a significant increment of workload for a range of individuals,” according to a House Judiciary Committee report from that year.
“It’s called the ‘Messenger Relief Act’ because it provided so much business to couriers,” said Jeff Lubbers, a professor at American University’s Washington College of Law.
For years, the GAO tracked all the final regulations it had received. But starting in November 2011, it gave up monitoring all but the biggest rules in the face of staff cuts.
Copeland, the retired research staffer, set out to tally how many rules had fallen by the wayside since: Out of more than 9,000 rules issued since the start of 2012, more than 1,800 were not reported to the GAO, he found.
Most of the missing rules are minor. But 43 have been deemed “significant” by the Office of Management and Budget, and six of those count as major. Three rules published in early 2013 carried out the Pentagon’s sexual-$#%&!@*ault prevention and response program; one was estimated to cost nearly $15 billion to implement.
The only measure overturned since the law was p$#%&!@*ed was an ergonomics rule that the Labor Department adopted just before former president Bill Clinton left office.
“This is a make-work statute,” said Columbia Law School professor Peter L. Strauss, an administrative and regulatory law specialist. “It creates volumes of paperwork for Congress and the GAO that sit on the floor.”
Former senator Don Nickles (R-Okla.), one of the law’s original sponsors, said the statute helps lawmakers hold hearings and use other tactics to influence regulations before they take effect. Major rules are not supposed to go into force until 60 days after they are reported to Congress or published in the Federal Register, whichever is later.
When informed about the hundreds of missing rules, Nickles — who now heads his own consulting and lobbying firm — said: “It sounds like they’re breaking the law.”
—-
Go directly to jail, do not p$#%&!@* go.
Pretty soon you’ll be unemployed!!!
Wrong
clown