As has become customary after a terrorist attack, Barrack Obama is once again choosing to ignore the radical Islamic roots that have been at the cause of nearly every major act of terror since his presidency began.
Instead, he’s blaming “homegrown extremism” as the cause for the shooting, while conveniently ignoring the cause of the self-radicalisation. Obama has no doubt adopted this strategy in order to protect the image of peaceful Muslims across the country, but by never uttering “Islamic extremism,” he isn’t helping Muslims, he’s refusing to differentiate them from the terrorists their religion produced.
Obama decided the right course of action was to attack Christianity. Of course, that’s his response to many of his problems.
See what Obama said about the country’s major religions on the next page:
DONALD J TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT
GEE! I wonder whose side he’s REALLY on!!
Ain’t that the fucking truth.
Be so glad when he leaves office! He keeps us in danger.
Idiot !
We need to talk. We need to do our research. We need to identify the real problem. You accidentally cut a finger off. What do you do? You damn sure don’t wait a couple days to see if it grows back. You immediately go get help to fix the problem. Everything something like this happens it’s forgotten after a week or two. And we go back to posing cat videos and how much you love cake. Nothing ever gets better. It only gets worse. What’s the real issue here? Yes people should donate blood and do what they can to help but we never fix the real issue. And sad to say but a lot of people are donating blood for no reason. Red Cross once reported after tragedies like this happen there is a massive influx of blood being donated. A lot of it goes to waste. But that’s beside my point. We need to get to the real bottom of this and now. Before its to late. Before its allowed to happen again. Before the people who are truly behind all of these events let it happen again. Before mainstream shoves some other b******t agenda down our throats. “And coming up at 11. Killer bunnies in our town? Are we all gonna die by their fluffy tail toxins and scary eye lasers? Tune in to find out.” WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!! Am I the only one who feels this way or what?!?
The ultimate goal of muslim world is to blow Israel off themap…to accomplish this….THE USA. musy be neutralized. Obama seems to be a part of that.
OBAMA NEEDS TO STUFF IT..SHUT THE F UP AND GET A CLUE NOBODY CARES WHAT HE IS SQWAKING ABOUT..HE IS WAY BEHIND. HIS EXCUSES ARE AS OLD AS THE HILLS..AND IT’S TIME TO LAY THEM TO REST..DEAD AND BURIED..BUILD A NEW HOME DEPOT AND MOVE ON.
Simple Definition of traitor
a person who is not loyal to his or her own country, friends, etc. : a person who betrays a country or group of people by helping or supporting an enemy.
Full Definition of traitor
1 one who betrays another’s trust or is false to an obligation or duty
2 one who commits treason
treason
n. the crime of betraying one’s country, defined in Article III, section 3 of the U. S. Constitution: “Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.” Treason requires overt acts and includes the giving of government security secrets to other countries, even if friendly, when the information could harm American security. Treason can include revealing to an antagonistic country secrets such as the design of a bomber being built by a private company for the Defense Department. Treason may include “espionage” (spying for a foreign power or doing damage to the operation of the government and its agencies, particularly involved in security) but is separate and worse than “sedition” which involves a conspiracy to upset the operation of the government. (See: sedition, espionage)
TREASON, crim. law. This word imports a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance. 4 Bl. Com. 75.
2. The constitution of the United States, art. 3, s. 3, defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war (q.v.) against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is punished with death. Act of April 30th, 1790, 1 Story’s Laws U. S. 83. By the same article of the constitution, no person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court. Vide, generally, 3 Story on the Const. ch. 39, p. 667; Serg. on the Const. ch. 30; United States v. Fries, Pamph.; 1 Tucker’s Blackst. Comm. Appen. 275, 276; 3 Wils. Law Lect. 96 to 99; Foster, Disc. I; Burr’s Trial; 4 Cranch, R. 126, 469 to 508; 2 Dall. R. 246; 355; 1 Dall. Rep. 35; 3 Wash. C. C. Rep. 234; 1 John. Rep. 553 11 Johns. R. 549; Com. Dig. Justices, K; 1 East, P. C. 37 to 158; 2 Chit. Crim. Law, 60 to 102; Arch. Cr. Pl. 378 to 387.
SEDITION, crimes. The raising commotions or disturbances in the state; it is a revolt against legitimate authority, Ersk. Princ. Laws, Scotl. b. 4, t. 4, s. 14; Dig. Lib. 49, t. 16, 1. 3, Sec. 19.
2. The distinction between sedition and treason consists in this, that though its ultimate object is a violation of the public peace, or at least such a course of measures as evidently engenders it, yet it does not aim at direct and open violence against the laws, or the subversion of the constitution. Alis. Crim. Law of Scotl. 580.
High Crimes and Misdemeanors:
The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct peculiar to officials, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, conduct unbecoming, and refusal to obey a lawful order. Offenses by officials also include ordinary crimes, but perhaps with different standards of proof and punishment than for nonofficials, on the grounds that more is expected of officials by their oaths of office.
SO WRONG….AMERICA WANTS TRUMP….Make America Safe Again