According to Judicial Watch, “the Obama administration let 1,519 ‘inadmissible’ foreigners embroiled in terrorism into the U.S. last year. Yes, that is right. Obama invited clearly known Islamic terrorists to come to the U.S.
“Before the Obama administration tweaked a federal law last year, these foreign nationals would have been banned from the country for supporting terrorist causes,” Judicial Watch writes. “But under the changes the Secretary of Homeland Security has ‘discretionary authority’ to waive certain grounds of inadmissibility relating to terrorism.”
Read more about the vicious terrorists that Barack Obama welcomed to the nation on the next page:
Is there a tiny little 666 tatooed on this cretins head or something?
this man is a danger to America for letting this happen he should be lock up for this. I never trusted Obama from the start but some people did they might have in danger all of America. he is not a leader that should of been in charge.
treason
We do know from border patrol there are more other than Mexicans crossing the border. We do know from Spain that the terrorists are buying and selling arms in South America and making their way here thanks to the drug cartels. The government has known this for ten years due to documents found. Why is this story unbelievable?
Obama is just making sure that he leaves the Muslim cancer before he leaves!
Terrorist Muslim
Would imagine it was in the millions over eight years. In early 2009 he imported thousands of so-called Hamas Refugees, but knowing him now, would imagine they were Hamas Terrorists. He has had eight years to load up America with Islamic Terrorists.
Do you not see a huge leap from covert entry to allowing 1500 alleged terrorists in? Also, if this is true as presented, “under duress” is a big modifier. Think child soldiers in Africa. I did a look at this story, and after a solid couple minutes it was apparent it is being promulgated almost exclusively by sources such as Alex Jones and WND; neither are known for their objectivity.
Do you not see a huge leap from covert entry to allowing 1500 alleged terrorists in? Also, if this is true as presented, “under duress” is a big modifier. Think child soldiers in Africa. I did a look at this story, and after a solid couple minutes it was apparent it is being promulgated almost exclusively by sources such as Alex Jones and WND; neither are known for their objectivity.
Do you not see a huge leap from covert entry to allowing 1500 alleged terrorists in? Also, if this is true as presented, “under duress” is a big modifier. Think child soldiers in Africa. I did a look at this story, and after a solid couple minutes it was apparent it is being promulgated mostly by sources such as Alex Jones and WND; neither are known for their objectivity.