Showing complete disregard for both decorum and reality, President Obama persists in his belief that terrorism is not a major threat even after the deadly attacks in Brussels.
Speaking to reporters at a baseball game in Havana, Cuba, Obama spouted the usual platitudes about uniting to stop terror but neglected to offer any serious solutions to the issue. You would think he would be a bit more sensitive to the issue after dismissing ISIS as “the JV team” shortly before the group started rampaging across Iraq and Syria, but apparently he learned nothing from the issue.
Refusing to so much as raise the casual-style sunglasses obscuring his eyes, Obama appeared a little defensive as the reporters questioned him over his refusal to return home to plan a counterattack.
Obama argued that altering his schedule would play into the terrorists’ hands by showing they could “disrupt” things, i.e. his schedule chockful of such self-aggrandizing activities as enjoying baseball in the capital of an authoritarian state.
In other words, it’s best to just ignore the attacks.
Watch Obama speak about the attacks on the next page:
Angel Toro : My facts are correct. The CIA had bin Laden in their crosshairs and Clinton would not have him killed. Clinton’s responses to 2 African embassy bombings, 1st WTC bombing and USS Cole attack was weak at best. Clinton did threatened retaliation and did nothing. I suggest you revisit Bill Clinton and his record ( or lack there of ) on counter-terrorism. This is WHY 9/11 occurred after Bush was in office afte only 8 1/2 months.
he is SO worried about his responsibilities isn’t he LOL
NO RESPONSE IS VIABLE
this is sick people
buck Ofama
Jillian Ritchie
idiot
Nancy Hopper So Clinton purposely wasted milions of dollars in Tomohawk missles shot at traing camps in Afghanistan time and time again? The 9/11 attacks were in the works for years. Suggesting “Clinton did nothing” reveals you to not know what you are talking about and not living in reality but inserting polical bias. If you suggest that, then you have to agree that Bush did nothing because he wouldn’t “have him killed” when we had him on real time surveilance with a predator. You can’t have it both ways. Are you an expert on Terrorism? How do you know or quantify that Clinton’s retaliation was “weak at best”, but in the very next sentence suggest “he did nothing”? That’s an absurd evaluation. What experience are you basing this of to make that suggestion?
Everytime this freak moron obama opens his foul mouth he shows his true hate for this country and his love for islam+++
What has Trump Done; Anything at all?