For Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and almost everyone else on the left in America, terrorism is not the problem. Guns are the problem.
The only time that guns are not the problem is when a shooter is a white Christian male. Then white Christian males are the problem. But usually, for liberals, it is a combination of both.
Following Sunday’s terrorist attack by an Islamic extremist on a gay nightclub in Orlando, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) was quick to point out the true culprit behind the attack — “the Christian right.” Yes, according to the ACLU, this Islamic terrorist who pledged his allegiance to ISIS was taking his cues from the “anti-queer climate” created by Republicans.
Tuesday, President Obama took to the podium to — yet again — blame guns for Sunday’s attack. In his speech, the president again failed to make any mention of the shooter’s ideology or motive.
To watch the video of Obama’s renewed call to shred the Second Amendment and read more about who the president truly blames, continue on the next page:
Can an executive action stand if it violates a Constitution Right?
Ok. I’m going to have to fix a few people on here because emotions are high and stupid$#%&!@*is being supported.
First off, most of you have no clue what an assault rifle is! It’s not your fault you don’t know, I will educate you. An assault rifle is a rifle with the ability to go fully automatic. That means if you hold the trigger down, it keeps going bang until you release the trigger or the weapon runs out of ammo. The first assault rifle came about during WWII with the German Stg44. It had the power of a rifle with nearly the rate of fire of a sub-machine gun (full auto). Inspired out of this WWII era gun came the most well knows assault rifles of all time, the AK-47 and the M-16. Both had the ability for fully automatic fire. When people say they want a ban on assault weapons they think they are banning fully automatic rifles from civilian hands. The problem is that these weapons are ALREADY BANNED! See National Firearms Act of 1934, Gun Control Act of 1968, and Firearm Ownership Protection Act of 1986. Civilians cannot obtain these weapons. They are for military and police use almost exclusively.
So what is this AR-15 if not an assault rifle? It is a standard rifle that LOOKS LIKE a fully automatic M-16, but does not function like one. It does the same thing as any other standard rifle. One trigger pull = one bang. Most of you are not stupid enough to want to ban a Ruger Mini-14 ranch rifle (pictured on top), but cry that the AR-15 (pictured on bottom) is a deadly assault rifle when they are literally capable of the same thing. Same ammo, same capacity, same function. The aesthetic differences between the two are what some want to ban and have banned in the past, which if you look at them, are pants-on-head-retarded to consider deadly features. Some of the things that made a standard functioning rifle considered an assault weapon are:
A folding or telescoping stock – (does not make the weapon any deadlier).
A pistol grip – (does not make the weapon any deadlier).
A bayonet mount – (does not make the weapon any deadlier).
A flash suppressor – (does not make the weapon any deadlier).
You see what I’m getting at? The weapons you actually want banned are ALREADY BANNED. The weapons used in these attacks are regular functioning rifles designed to look like their full auto, military counterparts.
So if the AR-15 isn’t more dangerous than any other standard rifle, then why is is the one being used in all of these shootings? Simple. It just happens to be the most popular rifle in the country. It’s the iPhone of rifles. It is an affordable, accurate rifle that is easy to personalize because everyone makes accessories for it. It isn’t any easier to acquire than other rifles, just more available.
To wrap this up, If you support banning fully automatic assault rifles, fine. You support a law that is already in place for good reason. I agree we generally don’t need machine guns. However, if you think we should ban standard functioning rifles because of things like how you hold the grip or how adjustable the buttstock is, you are an idiot!
Consider yourselves educated on this matter.
WE THE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO DRAW THE LINE ON THIS ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NO ONE IS GIVING UP THIER GUNS!!!!
THERE WILL BE MORE BLOOD ON THIS TERRORIST’S HANDS!!!!!!!
If this thug and the rest of these gun grabbers are so hell bent on go after our guns what’s the hold up lets get this fight started and let’s see who comes out in the end
Let him lead by example. Turn in all the guns etc that arm to watch for him and it and girls. Lead by example. Yet we give during fast and furious and also to those responsible for Benghazi both by dems guarded by guns. Show us. Give it all up there wuss!!!!
Please let him try some stupid$#%&!@*like that maybe it will get people to revolt
That would incite one hell of a riot and result in an attack on the White House!
Bite me
A muzzle loading musket could be considered an assault weapon. But in todays parlance, it must be full auto(machine gun) to be an assault weapon. Sorry, Barry. Been illegal since 1934.
Prepare to be tried and convicted, unlike ClintonBilly.