On Saturday, February 13th, Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia was found dead at a ranch in southern Texas. That alone would qualify the story as a tragedy, since Scalia was a tireless advocate of the Constitution and its original intent.
A brilliant legal scholar possessed of a unique gift for both legal analysis and scathing wit, Scalia often wrote dissenting opinions in cases where the federal government usurped powers not delegated to it, or where the other justices sitting on the court with him took it upon themselves to decide Constitutional questions as if they were legislators. His gift for eloquent defense of liberty and justice, even in the face of massive pressure made him one of Liberty’s staunchest guardians on the Supreme Court.
Found dead of a supposed heart attack at a ranch owned by long time Obama donor and Democrat party hack John Poindexter, questions are rightly being asked at the contradictory and questionable behaviors demonstrated in this case.
Ruled “natural causes” by a judge over the telephone, found with a pillow over his head and his bed sheets unslept in, there are too many uncertainties and contradictions to view this as a “death by natural causes.”
Obama and Poindexter, courtesy Houston Business Journal, August 15, 2010
Continue to page two for more questions over this possible assasination.
LA Times: “Nominating Supreme Court justices is Obama’s job. Let him do it.”We’re beyond angry, so we’ll keep this quick. Mitch McConnell and the Republicans are refusing to consider ANY Obama nominee to the Supreme Court. IMO WE NEED TO FIND OUT WHY AND WHO MURDERED OR ORDERED THE MURDER OF JUSTICE SCALIA. WHO WOULD BENEFIT THE MOST FROM SCALIA’S DEATH? WOULD YOU LIKE THAT PERSON TO APPOINT THE SUCCESSOR TO JUSTICE SCALIA. THE PERSON OR PERSONS WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SCALIA’S DEATH NEED TO PUNISHED SO WE KNOW THAT THE KILLER IS NOT APPOINTING ANYONE TO THE HIGH COURT. STAY STRONG MITCH MCCONNELL–DO THE RIGHT THING!
Following the unexpected death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Senate Republicans have gone to battle to make sure that President Barack Obama does not get to nominate a replacement for Scalia. They have made it abundantly clear that they do not intend to approve any nominees put forward by the president.The block stems from concerns that Obama will attempt to place another liberal justice in the court, therefore shifting the balance towards the left. If he does that successfully, the legal system could potentially favor his progressive agenda.However, NBC reports that Obama may have already decided who he will nominate to the Supreme Court—and it isn’t looking good for Republicans to dismiss it outright.According to Supreme Court analyst Tom Goldstein, there is a “very strong possibility” that Obama will nominate Attorney General Loretta Lynch to fill the now-vacant seat.“The fact that Lynch was vetted so recently for attorney general also makes it practical for the president to nominate her in a relatively short order,” Goldstein wrote on his blog.Lynch’s “history as a career prosecutor makes it very difficult to paint her as excessively liberal” Goldstein notes. Lynch would also be the first black female to be nominated for the Supreme Court—bringing in issues of race and gender sensitivity.“I think the administration would relish the prospect of Republicans either refusing to give Lynch a vote or seeming to treat her unfairly in the confirmation process,” Goldstein commented. “Either eventuality would motivate both black and women voters.”
Yup …..
Probably
Yes!
Obama will get what’s coming to him, sorry pos!!!
There should be an ivestigation.
yes
Who knows
First thing that crossed my mind and I honestly think the man did.
Wondering!!