The standoff in Oregon between local rights advocates and the federal government regarding the ranchers who are being sent to prison over fires they set in 2006 to clear their land of brush and weeds is increasing in intensity.
Outside groups have made their way to the Malheur Wildlife Reserve and taken over the building (which was unoccupied). The government has responded by sending SOD-X Reserve/National Guard Special Operations troops, with the very clear potential for armed conflict.
This is once again a strong arm effort by the government to show that they own much of the land in Oregon (close to 50 of the entire land mass), and that locals such as ranchers must cow-tow to the government in Washington D.C.
There are serious issues here, and many Constitutional scholars indicate that the Federal government cannot, in fact, own land except for a section in the District of Columbia, plus some ports and seaways. But that may be a moot point when you have the U.S. military going against a rag-tag band of ranchers.
More on page 2:
Black protesters were met by explicit force from the beginning lol
They weren’t foreign, they proved their families owned the land prior to being pillaged
An strong warning indood!
You’re a dumb$#%&!@* Read the constitution before you speak. The Bundy’s are not breaking the law! You’re a typical sheep in this country!
You guys have been pissing me off lately with your biased reports on what’s really going on out there.
If you are twisting up what is actually taking place, causing long time supporters of your articles to become confused as to what is going on, you are no better than those who wish to divide the country against itself.
Trying to downplay what has happened, to downplay the intentions and desired outcome, and point blank to not support the Constitution period shows what direction this “Truth and Action” organization is all about.
Some of the most important issues you guys write about, it seems as though you get your info by “assumption” & then your authors throw in bias that supports your desire to not uphold the documents and laws that enabled our country to become great, those of which mainly being the Constitutional right to stand up to an oppressive government.
To all those spitting vomit regurgitated from the MSM, Indian or Non-Indian alike, stop and pause a moment.
The far bigger issue here is that since 9/11 Washington has usurped individual citizen rights and nearly overnight turned the government from a once democratic republic into a fascist totalitarian police state and the oppressed, abused American people are fast reaching the breaking point of armed rebellion, all by carefully plotted federalist/globalist design. The central powers’ sinister game has been to intentionally push fed up Americans over the edge with each passing year its militarized police force continuing to terrorize and murder mounting numbers of unarmed Americans (over a thousand in 2015 alone), launching an all-out war against its own citizens of every political persuasion on both left and right by lumping them together to identify the whole lot as so called “radicalized extremists.” This long awaited, plotted scenario sets the stage for the next major false flag crisis to break out, giving more than ample enough excuse for the feds to use deadly force to quell the citizen uprising and subsequently spread civil disturbance across the nation in order to declare martial law that will readily pave the way toward one world government and ultimately formalize a New World Order slavery over the entire human species on this planet.
If “We The People” are to win this……we are going to have to cooperate and confront the elephant in the room.
So where are all the veterans, past and present, who swore an oath to to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. “We the People” demand you honor your oath….
The defense of the Constitution requires members of the Armed Forces to disobey illegal orders. And, in the case of alleged treasonous acts, members of the Armed Forces are constitutionally bound to arrest such offenders. (See The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ, 64 Stat. 109, 10 U.S.C. §§ 801–946).
There is NO EXPIRATION DATE, the oath is for an indeterminate period; no duration is specifically defined, none…… All it requires is for those who have taken their oaths of office to act on what they swore they would actually do.
If you can’t/won’t honor your oath of service or participate in an honest dialog, then you are hereby charged with Dereliction of Duty and possibly Treason…
The best analysis of this situation I have read…..By Joachim Hagopian
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article43933.htm
The problem is civil obedience
http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/zinnproblemdisobedience.html
Please…..read the Declaration of Independence, the constitution, the amendments and the federalist papers…..
We are missing the points we need to be focused on in order to call upon the ones who took the oath to defend AND protect the constitution and address their dereliction to do so.
Come back and let’s discuss how to confront the elephant in the room….before we all loose the promise, the agreement we accepted as our constitution.
Omari Roland
The Vietnamese did not live in the USA. The land was handed down from family.
And no one will stand beside them. So when the government starts shooting, the ones at the compound will get no help from anyone. Just a bunch of lip service from people on social media. Why not surround the feds? There are more of us than there are of them. No, when the revolution finally starts, it will be short and sweet and the government will win because no one today is willing to take it to the next level for anyone or any reason. If it doesn’t involve them personally, they could care less. It is a good thing that they all didn’t feel that way in 1776.
Big deal, you copied something out of a history book. Are you/would you be willing to put it all on the line for someone you never met and would probably never meet again? If you can’t say yes to either one, then you are irrelevant.