As The Washington Post reported, the New York Times is in such a hurry to jump on the bandwagon in support of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) that it didn’t even read the “trade agreement,” as the Obama administration insists on calling it. Why didn’t the New York Times read the agreement like the critical, self-sufficient, ethical journalists they with to portray?
Because NOBODY in the public has read the agreement.
The Washington Post explains:
Baaaaa baaaa yes ok
Meanwhile, Canada has announced it will be rethinking joining the
“Partnership”, due to the threat on it’s national sovereignty.
Good thinking on Canada’s part.
Trust me they know what’s in it they probably helped write it
insanity
Senator Jeff Sessions has read this Bill months ago and begged our legislators not to vote it up. Sessions stated that we will join other Nations in a NWO and Tribunals will become the ruling force. What could be worse than that? Congress already sold us out and gave Obama ruling power and voted it up. It now is going through the “waiting” period before Obama signs it, which he will sign it. We live in a Post-Cons$#%&!@*ution America. Our USA flag will be next to dis$#%&!@*emble.
Obama tool
New York Times is propaganda .
NYT IS COMMUNIST INFESTED AND ANTI AMERICAN.
If the NYT (a propaganda rag for Obama ) supports it ..Then we know it is wrong for the USA….
New you times stands for OBAMA