When residents took to the streets to protest the recent killing of unarmed 18-year-old Michael Brown by local police in the small town of Ferguson, Missouri, we get a clear look at today’s law enforcement – not exactly persons you would feel comfortable calling should you need to be protected or served.
Instead of showing up to help serve citizens exercising their rights to protest against an injustice, these law enforcement officers show up in full military gear, flaunting an ‘us vs them’ mentality.
This is the new USA.
“Why do these cops need MARPAT camo pants again,” I asked on Twitter this morning. One of the most interesting responses came from a follower who says he served in the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division: “We rolled lighter than that in an actual warzone,” writes Paul Szoldra from Business Insider, who wrote an penned an article questioning the recent change in our law enforcement.
There can be no doubt that American citizens are the new ‘insurgents’. The state is obviously preparing for a coming event. Are you aware of this? Are you prepared?
We looked intimidating, but all of our vehicles and equipment had a clear purpose for combat against enemy forces. So why is this same gear being used on our city streets?
On Saturday, a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, shot and killed 18-year-old Michael Brown, an unarmed black man. In the days that have followed, the town with a population of about 21,000 has seen massive protests in response to the shooting, as some witnesses said Brown had his hands up when he was killed.
Putting aside what started the protests for a moment, it’s worth discussing the police response to the outrage. In photos taken Monday, we are shown a heavily armed SWAT team.
They have short-barreled 5.56-mm rifles based on the military M4 carbine, with scopes that can accurately hit a target out to 500 meters. On their side they carry pistols. On their front, over their body armor, they carry at least four to six extra magazines, loaded with 30 rounds each.
AP Photo/Jeff Roberson
Police officers try to disperse a crowd Monday in Ferguson, Missouri.
Their uniform would be mistaken for a soldier’s if it weren’t for their “Police” patches. They wear green tops, and pants fashioned after the U.S. Marine Corps MARPAT camouflage pattern. And they stand in front of a massive uparmored truck called a Bearcat, similar in look to a mine-resistant ambush protected vehicle, or as the troops who rode in them call it, the MRAP.
When did this become OK? When did “protect and serve” turn into “us versus them”?
“Why do these cops need MARPAT camo pants again,” I asked on Twitter this morning. One of the most interesting responses came from a follower who says he served in the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division: “We rolled lighter than that in an actual warzone.”
AP/Jeff Roberson
The police point their weapons at a car as it pulls away after tear gas was used by authorities Monday in Ferguson, Missouri.
Let’s be clear: This is not a war zone — even if the FAA banned flights under 3,000 feet. This is a city outside of St. Louis where people on both sides are angry. Protesters have looted and torched a gas station, and shots were fired at police, according to The Washington Post.
The scene is tense, but the presence of what looks like a military force doesn’t seem to be helping.
“Bring it. You fucking animals, bring it,” one police officer was caught on video telling protesters. In Ferguson and beyond, it seems that some police officers have shed the blue uniform and have put on the uniform and gear of the military, bringing the attitude along with it.
Matt Ford, the social-media editor at The Atlantic, summed it up well:
And here’s journalist Radley Balko, author of “Rise of the Warrior Cop“:
In Afghanistan, we patrolled in big, armored trucks. We wore uniforms that conveyed the message, “We are a military force, and we are in control right now.” Many Afghans saw us as occupiers.
And now we see some of our police officers in this same way. “The militarization of law enforcement is counter-productive to domestic policing and needs to stop,” tweeted Andrew Exum, a former Army infantry officer.
If there’s one thing I learned in Afghanistan, it’s this: You can’t win a person’s heart and mind when you are pointing a rifle at his or her chest.
PAZ
well duh after they behaved like they did the other night….cant blame this to come about…. they are acting like invaders or terriorists in my mind
I DON’T CALL ANYONE WORTHLESS POS, BUT THEY ARE CRIMINALS AND SHOULD BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW!!!
As a resident living 20 miles away the STL Police aren’t perfect by far but, they have to deal with this mentality every day on the street and why shouldn’t they be able to protect themselves when they’re outnumbered having bottles, bricks and gunfire coming their way. Yes, I believe Obama and this Admin have an agenda to weaken we Citizens with taking away our gun rights which that won’t happen at my house I’m just saying don’t rush to judgement on this particular case as the Cop was shot at and looks like he got trigger happy but, all the evidence is under investigation (I sound like Obama) with that one but, if these thugs do as they’re saying to come after the White People that’s when they’ll have more problems than just the Cops shooting at them.
Mine are all cleaned and oiled,,,oh,and i am an x-pert marksman..!
A peaceful protest would not have brought out this kind of force. Rioters and looters are why this has happened. And you’ve got New Black Panthers out there still inciting violence, against the police and whites. This is why they are out in protective gear. And all along, of course Al Sharpton is stirring up racism. There are conflicting stories about the shooting of the unarmed teen. I’ve read that he was thieving and then resisting arrest. I don’t agree with shooting him, but I can’t judge the situation since I wasn’t there. I don’t believe the spin that he was a perfectly innocent kid just walking around minding hisown business when the police just came up and shot him for no reason.
Labeling this young mans death as an injustice is assuming evidence that has not yet come to light, as happened in the Trey Von Martin case. I have read that this young man attacked the officer, shoved him into his car while attempting to take the officers gun, the officer was badly beaten, if this is the case then the young man is partly to blame. Why is it that the media does not cover the greatest threat to black teens is black on black homicide, or hate crimes when they are perpetrated on whites? Let us all be sad at any persons death and not always assume anything until properly investigated.
CHICAGO IS A LOOTING STATE. CRIME FILLED, DRUG DEALERS, THE LIST GOES ON. SOMETHING HAS TO BE DONE TO STOP THESE MONSTROSITIES WHICH HARM THE RIGHTS OF PEACE SEEKING RESIDENTS. POLICE STEP UP THEIR REGIMEN AGAINST BOLDER CRIME.
Law enforcement, in general has a “military state” attitude.
what are they supposed to do? twiddle their thumbs?