Two professors recently announced the discovery of five different types of “invisibility microaggressions” that women and people of color frequently encounter.
According to the study published earlier this week by Annemarie Vaccaro, a Higher Education professor at the University of Rhode Island, and Jasmine Mena, a Psychology professor at Bucknell University, most microaggressions are “invisible” but “real”.
This is very confusing. How can something be a racist microaggression, but invisible or nonexistent?
An example of one of these so-called microaggressions, is the question “Where are you from?” According to liberal goons, asking this question is a racist microaggression because it could imply the person is not from a nice neighborhood or doesn’t belong.
Here is the voice of reason – regardless the culture or language – basic conversational verbalizations such as “Where are you from?” are taught in any language class, be it informal or academic.
The question “Where are you from?” has absolutely nothing to do with “white privilege” or uniquely born of the racial dynamics within the U.S. and other Western societies.
Academia has become nothing more than an indoctrination/propaganda wing for the hard left. Nothing proves this more than the bogus list of five “real” but “invisible” racist microaggressions every white person is guilty of committing.
Learn more on the next page.
Spelling$#%&!@*
My black Labrador has a pink collar with chrome spikes and studs and a purple leash!
I must be going to hell for this obvious color clashing.
Don’t think they would meet the qualifications
…even sanitation engineers have standards
Such commitment to stupidity
Always pushing
how the hell do they come up with such utter b******t
these darn people need a REAL JOB instead of too much time for thinking stupid.. where are you from has been asked since before racism every was thought of.. it means exactly what it implies. where the hell are you from . it’s a polite conversation to talk with a stranger .. lord save these stupid people from themselves.
What a bunch of psuedo-intellectual horse puckey! Did someone actually give them grant money from American taxpayers for this malarkey? This divisive nonsense does not deserve to be funded! This “study” is nonsense.
Really? What alternate reality did these morons step out of?
If we try to explain using a number line, it becomes imaginary, potentially negative.