It has been said that the purpose of the military is to hurt people and to break things. The military projects power, and that is one reason the Left is so opposed to it. Liberals will spout idiotic axioms like “Make love, not war, war is not the answer, and give peace a chance,” as if they are saying something profound. They are not. Conservatives do not like war any more than Liberals do, but they recognize that it is sometimes necessary, expensive, and supremely damaging to all involved. To suggest that Conservatives like going to war is extraordinarily idiotic, but is a belief system that most Liberals hold to. They somehow also believe that war is never necessary, so the military itself is seen as an unnecessary, aggressive war machine which could or should be done away with.
If the military cannot be done away with, the next idea that Liberals have is that the military should become a government social program and a jobs creator. And because Liberals never intend on actually fighting a war and believe that good negotiating skills and U.N. intervention can eliminate the need for military readiness and trained warriors, they have decimated the equipment levels, drawn down the troop numbers, sissified the entire organization, and demanded that women in the military rotate into combat positions and leadership. It is part of the effort to eliminate the divide between men and women, even if it puts our troops at risk and destroys military morale. The damage will remain unseen until we truly need combat readiness and the ability to protect our nation.
See the next program to undermine our military, page 2:
Greg Allard I agree and disagree at the same time. I agree that women can very efficiently serve in non physical, non combat roles. No argument from me there. I disagree with the method of getting them there, ie “The Draft”. Not to be purposely redundant with my earlier remarks I will simply say that a woman that wishes to volunteer for service I applaud and honor. A country that forces women into military service, I deplore. Here’s another argument against this issue that I will put forward… Let’s suppose you have a husband and wife or a boyfriend and girlfriend with children and other household responsibilities. They both get drafted. Now what? Who gets the exception? Why do they get an exception? Do neither get an exception? Who takes care of the children at home? Where is Rosie the riveter at home? etc… I just see this issue as political correctness gone amok.
Absolutely not – this is just more added destruction to the U.S. military.
Yes sir I’m sure if EVERYONE was required to due at least two years in the military the crime rate would be lower, the politicians wouldn’t be such scum sucking twatwaffles, the youth of America wouldn’t be such asshat’s and our vets would be treated better by the VA
TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT
Ant Card you make some amazing points about females in combat roles and drafting them could be a disaster but I thought you might like to see this https://www.facebook.com/ajplusenglish/videos/726524227489087/
Before any of you say a woman can “fight” you might wanna look at this https://www.facebook.com/ajplusenglish/videos/726524227489087/
Check this out dude https://www.facebook.com/ajplusenglish/videos/726524227489087/
Just like the fags can marry . Your daughters will now have to earn those equal rights they keep yelling about . With the way the last two generation of young men turned out ( bunch of fucking pansies ) you’re gonna need the girls to keep$#%&!@*going ! Most of them have more balls then their male counterparts .
Wake up people one more way to weaken our country’s defense
Everyone should serve for 2yrs after high school!!!!!!