There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
You’ve either done years of REAL research or you haven’t. Many of us have and we know the truth. And we don’t have to answer or waste our time on smartass dimwits like you. Tim Leach
These conspiracy people are NUTS!
Don’t care. This was an inside job, regardless of your engineers.
Knew that when it happened
We all knew it. All 3 buildings were controlled demolition and Bush knew about it before it happened.
Wack jobs
Umm, duh?
They all were
Chase Elliot Franklin Bolling
If all were demolition then where are the missing planes and all the passengers