There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
Don’t forget to add yourself to the list of crackpots you should really get first place
Really? Has any public person ever admitted Building 7 was demo’d, for any reason?
Tammy if it was a missle explain all the aircraft parts such as landing gear engines parts or the wings and fuselage. I’m sure you won’t answer since you haven’t answered or explained a single thing I have asked you. I’m sure the reason is because you really don’t know what you are talking about
real americans remember this attack on your country.
doesn,t matter how long it burnt it was attacked from foreingers.
You are a waste of my time so you have a good day.
It didn’t take a specific study to realize this.
Simply an analytical mind.
The laws of your stupidity is just that a law
Sure Tim Leach I will answer. There was no plane or plane parts. As I said several times before
Bill & Hilly Klinton planted the explosives.