There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
This is not news!
Tammy Bistarkey did the people in New York that witnessed the planes flying into the buildings only see what they wanted them to see and is that the same case at the pentagon also? I’m still waiting for a response from you but I think you must of gone back to hiding in the basement
Everyday, people prove that Facebook is full of idiots that fell off their soapbox and landed online. If you believe this article you are simply crazy stupid!
O Billy I most certainly will listen to anyone that has something constructive to say but when I see a bunch of complete fools talking about things they know absolutely nothing about such as controlled demolition and no way would those towers fall that way well Billy I have spent forty years of my life building commercial buildings and multi story buildings and also demolished buildings using explosives. So I happen to know one or two things about this being it is my field of work. With that being the case I can positively say you people have no damn clue about what you are talking about. Those buildings fell that way because they designed and built to collapse into their own footprint in case of a catastrophic structural failure just as all skyscrapers are designed and built to collapse into their own footprint. So really you guys are foolish with all the c**p all of you are spouting Not a single one of you can actually answer any specific questions about any of this why is that Billy
If they were condemned then explain why people were still working in all the offices in those buildings. Also for your information the New York Port Authority owned those buildings. Good grief where the hell doy you people come up with all this c**p
Bob when the structural columns were damaged it transferred to load to the opposite columns. What caused it to collapse is that as the floor trusses began to loose there structural integrity they began to sag. As they started sagging they began pulling the exterior framework inward. When it reach a certain point it could no longer support the weight of the building above and it collapsed straight down just as it was designed and built to do. All skyscrapers are designed and built to collapse straight down into their own footprint in case of a catastrophic structural failure. If you look closely at the video you can see that it was leaning some to the side where the planes struck. When it started leaning as I said it immediately transfers the load to the opposite side to bring it straight down as they are designed to do.
Sorry you are wrong the owner of the towers was the New York Port Authority. Silverstein leased the buildings and it was a condition of that lease to insure against terrorist attackes. They were a huge value target to the terrorist and had already suffered one terrorist attack. The insurance money went to the Port Authority and was used to rebuild the site.
John just exactly what standards would that be? Also the way they came down is completely logical if you actually knew that these buildings came down exactly as they were designed and built All skyscrapers are designed and built to collapse into their own footprint in case of a catastrophic structural failure.
Blame it on Hillary and Obama
Mike Thompson explain to me how there were no planes that hit those buildings. Guess what Mike I saw two Boeing 767-200 jetliners fly right into those buildings with my very eyes. So Mike just how do you explain that.