There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
You people are ignorant as hell
Lisa Stella you have watched the pain do it but insist in you hate of Bush to believe this.
If they told you the sky is falling you would believe it. That’s what we call gullibility
https://www.thetrumpet.com/1332-churchills-warning-for-today
Would of been tore down anyway because of structure damage
yeah and people want to act like our government is so friggin innocent
all of it was controled
Anybody that didn’t know that is a liberal or an idiot. I guess it’s one and the same!
This c**p reminds me of Rosie o’donnel saying jet fuel couldn’t do that —- shortly after that a fuel truck crashed under a concrete overpass in the northwest and the resulting fire collapsed the bridge!!!
According to you with no proof to back your claim…
Tim Leach, The planes hit the bldgs, no doubt, but tower one was hit more to the right side and I agree with the weakening of the metal. BUT, the bldg should have fallen towards the right, not straight down.