There is more scientific proof suggesting Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition than the resulting fires from the debris.
A new scientific study found the official story surrounding 9/11 was not compatible with the laws of physics. Several studies have already reached similar conclusions. However, this is the 1st to provide the long-awaited definitive answers.
The new study conducted at the University of Alaska Fairbanks took things one step further – we now know with a high degree of scientific accuracy that the official NIST explanation of how the World Trade Center 7 building collapsed is not only suspect, it’s 100% false, according to the findings of this academic study.
This study replicated and remodeled every factor relating to that infamous day involving building 7. Complete study results and the undeniable scientific evidence indicating Building 7 was a deliberate job on the next page:
What size Tim hat you wear to keep those rays off your head?
Yawn
We are attacked by people from Afghanistan but in turn we got to war with Iraq? Hhhmmmm
They are certainly something Bill
waco, ruby ridge, 911, las vegas, sandy hook, d.c. public enemy # 1
Karl Susmark first it was not just the jet fuel burning the fire burned between 1500 and 1850 degrees. Second the steel did not melt it only had to heat up enough for the floor trusses to loose their structural integrity when that happened they started sagging and pulled the exterior framework inward to a point that it could no longer support the weight of the building above and it collapsed straight down just as it was designed to do every skyscraper it designed and built to collapse into their own footprint in case of a catastrophic structural failure go heat up a piece of steel in a charcoal grill and see how little it takes before you can bend it.
F**e news
The truth has been known for years and slowly emerging…now it’s being made public.
Really? What brought down the two towers of the world trade center?
Old news