Neocons Declare War on Trump, Threaten to Vote Hillary Instead


Donald Trump may not have many friends in D.C., but that isn’t stopping the American voters from trying to land him a job there anyway. Unsurprisingly, D.C.’s elite are not pleased, and now the foreign policy hawks on the hill are joining the party establishment to try to stop Trump.

In interviews with POLITICO, leading GOP foreign-policy hands — many of whom promoted the Iraq War, detest Putin and consider Israel’s security non-negotiable — said Trump would be a disaster for U.S. foreign policy and vowed never to support him. So deep is their revulsion that several even say they could vote for Hillary Clinton over Trump in November.

“Hillary is the lesser evil, by a large margin,” said Eliot Cohen, a former top State Department official under George W. Bush and a strategic theorist who argues for a muscular U.S. role abroad. Trump’s election would be “an unmitigated disaster for American foreign policy,” Cohen said, adding that “he has already damaged it considerably.”

Cohen, an Iraq war backer who is often called a neoconservative but said he does not identify himself that way, said he would “strongly prefer a third party candidate” to Trump, but added: “Probably if absolutely no alternative: Hillary.”

In a March 1 interview with Vox, Max Boot, a military historian at the Council on Foreign Relations who backed the Iraq War and often advocates a hawkish foreign policy, said that he, too, would vote for Clinton over Trump. “I’m literally losing sleep over Donald Trump,” he said. “She would be vastly preferable to Trump.”

These people are clearly so blinded by their hatred of Trump that they’re willing to support the Secretary of State who lied to the families of terror victims and negotiated a deal with a nuclear-hungry Iran.

Trump may not be their cup of tea — he’s not everyone’s, but their support of Hillary is inexcusable.

Source: Politico



Share

132 Comments

Leave a Reply

Pin It on Pinterest