The past year or so have not been good ones for the charlatans promoting the climate change/global warming hoax. More scientists are stepping forward to present alternative views while some researchers are finding huge discrepancies in the data used to promote the scam.
President Donald Trump’s bold decision to not sign on to the Paris climate agreement is yet another breach in the climate change wall erected by globalists interested in redistributing wealth.
The mainstream media aid and abet the climate change hoax by not reporting stories that run counter to the agreed narrative.
Meanwhile, world-class hypocrite Al Gore is out promoting his latest nutty documentary to a global audience that’s tired of his obnoxious bloviating. Gore’s problem is most of the dire warnings he hyped in his first film have turned out to totally preposterous and laughable.
Even the most gullible among his acolytes are starting to see the magnitude of the con he’s promoted. They also see how his lifestyle runs counter to everything he preaches.
Now comes word of a scientific report that blows one of his key messages to smithereens. On the next page, learn how NASA, once a reliable partner in the hoax, has changed its tune on a major tenet of climate change.
I’ve never really trusted NASA or any government controlled agency for that matter.
https://youtu.be/bVsvJn3b7FI
Obviously the fall in sea levels is a result of increased evaporization caused by_________________
(hint: Insert **Global warming** lol
I would comment but won’t waste the time since we are surely all underwater by now.
http://www.snopes.com/nasa-data-global-warming/
Total bs numbers particularly in their claims about sea level rise. Numerous BAD ASSUMPTIONS were made in these studies about ocean level rise, and worse than that, they just outright lied. The math is wrong and the modelling systems beyond severely flawed, they were manipulated to output the desired data to support their lies. The bad assumptions………
1. All the ice on earth will melt – it won’t by any stretch of the imagination. Even if it did and all the ice melt contributed to sea level rise, the math indicates about a 3cm rise maximum!!!!! Not 30 meters. Do the math. All the numbers for the amount of ice on earth and the surface area of the oceans is known. The volume X spread over the area Y is fundamental math.
2. All the continental ice will bypass inland lakes and aquafers to raise only the ocean levels – it wont as a large percentage of the melt will fill inland lakes and aquafers.
3. All the solid ice will remain in liquid form – it won’t as the atmospheric temps rise, so does its ability to retain water in its gaseous form.
4. They assumed that all the water bound icebergs will make the oceans rise 100% of their volume – they forgot that 90% of their volume is already displacing the water so the rise is only 10%.
5. Their calculations ignored the fact that when the ocean rises the surface area changes because the shorelines increase, therefore the calculation must be progressive based on an increasing surface area, and they weren’t.
6. The ‘climate experts’ are always citing the disappearance of various islands or changing shorelines as being absolute proof of the results of global warming. They conveniently forget that islands formed from volcanoes tend to change over time, rising and falling, expanding and shrinking. It happens with continents too BTW.
7. The earth as a system tends to self-correct. They don’t mention that normal trends indicate that when the ice near the north pole decreases, the ice near the south pole increases, and vice versa.
8. It is an absolute impossibility that the changing weight of the ice has any affect whatsoever on the wandering poles or inbalancing the earth given that the proportion of the weight of the earth compared to the weight of the ice is something in the order of a trillion to one. It’s like saying that a grain of sand in your tire tread will cause such a loss of control so as to put you in the ditch.
9. To think that these climate ‘scientists’ base these predictions on 200+/- years of data compared to the earths history of billions of years is beyond false arrogance, it is criminally misleading.
Ailene Armstrong plenty of other countries around the world.
Pic of Brazilian and Asian beach.
Ailene Armstrong plenty of countries around the world.
Pic of Brazilian beach.
Asian beach.