The past year or so have not been good ones for the charlatans promoting the climate change/global warming hoax. More scientists are stepping forward to present alternative views while some researchers are finding huge discrepancies in the data used to promote the scam.
President Donald Trump’s bold decision to not sign on to the Paris climate agreement is yet another breach in the climate change wall erected by globalists interested in redistributing wealth.
The mainstream media aid and abet the climate change hoax by not reporting stories that run counter to the agreed narrative.
Meanwhile, world-class hypocrite Al Gore is out promoting his latest nutty documentary to a global audience that’s tired of his obnoxious bloviating. Gore’s problem is most of the dire warnings he hyped in his first film have turned out to totally preposterous and laughable.
Even the most gullible among his acolytes are starting to see the magnitude of the con he’s promoted. They also see how his lifestyle runs counter to everything he preaches.
Now comes word of a scientific report that blows one of his key messages to smithereens. On the next page, learn how NASA, once a reliable partner in the hoax, has changed its tune on a major tenet of climate change.
The news blares that this is the hottest year on record… it’s in the 80’s every day in Nebraska in August. Not buying that b******t.
Ice floats above water and most of the ice they’re talking about is on Antarctica (land). If that ice melts, and I’m not interested in arguing whether it will or not, then the seas would rise significantly.
There is only so much water in the world. You can’t create it, and you can’t remove it. It rains, flows to the sea, evaporates to form clouds, and starts the cycle all over again. Duh. Al Gore, nothing more than a con man with enough money to pay for advertising his hoaxes.
I mean… I don’t care much for the rhetoric, but the charts do show a steady growth for the past 20-30 years. Climate change isn’t the question; how much of a role humanity has in climate change is the big question.
You’re right, you’re no expert.
Terry Robinson…the Democrats coined the term, climatologists and climate scientists….these scientists would have lost their funding under Obama if they didn’t go along…it’s been written about many times over..to claim the Republicans are doing it to the scientists is comical on it’s head…..the Democrats did it already, now the scientists arent worried about losing their funding…
Be No while ice may float greater than 70% of it is under the water which displaces water upwards. Therefore when it melts it would have an inversely proportionate effect and the level would decrease not increase.
Technically you are incorrect. If something floats it displaces its mass in water. If the overall mass of the object is less than the displaced mass of water the object will float. Ice is less dense than water (and sea water is even more dense than fresh water). If you put ice in a glass and mark the water level when the ice is floating. And come back after the ice melts the level will remain constant.
Any scientist that says the science is settled is not a scienctist at all. Science is NEVER settled. If it were the the earth would still be flat, and earth is the center of the universe.
If all of the sea ice did melt it would not change sea levels. This is because the water from such a melt would just replace the displacement caused by the ice.
One container ship puts out as much pollutants as all the cars in the US, annually.
They burn unrefined diesel fuel, worse than off road diesel.
Fuel is burned by the ton/hr. With a fleet of ships somewhere around 5000, well, you do the math.
Globalization is the biggest contradiction to the environmentalist argument.