It is imperative that the Left gets a victory soon. They have been lagging in many ways over the past several years. When you think about the complete devastation that has been taking place in the Party of the Jackass, you can rest assured that, while under the very guidance of Barack Hussein Obama and his numero uno henchwoman, Hillary Rodham-Clinton, they have been absolutely pummeled. From nearly the moment that Obama was elected and Hillary suffered her first gut-wrenching defeat at the hands of a Narcissistic brute, the Regressives have lost over 1,200 seats nationally. In addition to that, they have since seen a loss of the Senate, the House, and the Governorships in very large numbers.
Trump’s victory last November once again sealed Hillary Clinton’s demise and she has now been relegated to the back of the broken-down Hillary bus for the rest of eternity. Trump’s election has also fueled a renewed vigor in the Tea Party that has not seen the light of day since the height of its popularity after the Obamacare debacle. The Leftist media colossus has also fallen to the Trump Sword of Tweets and Swampland, USA is being drained little by little. Even globalism is collapsing piecemeal throughout the world. As well, the European Union is imploding. Regressivism is destroying itself.
Global Warming has taken a few lumps of its own. With the collapse of confidence that the American people have displayed in regards to man-made global warming, the IPCC’s email scandals, the severe drought of hurricanes over the last decade, an actual decrease in temperatures worldwide, and an increase in the Arctic Sea ice that has not been seen in decades, it’s quite apparent that the Left is in deep excrement.
That being said, the Leftist machine carries on, attempting to continue its sleight of hand in an effort to make you believe that which is just not so…EVEN IF THEY HAVE TO ALTER RESULTS.
NASA has been one of the magic words that the Regressives have been using for the past few years because they believed that the government office would necessarily always agree with them, even when the evidence for global warming just wasn’t there. And for the first half of the last decade, they were right. NASA was the long arm of Obama, appealing to Muslims in order to make them feel better about themselves. Do you remember that directive for NASA?
Nowadays, NASA has seemed to bring things back down to Earth, so to say. They have released a new study about the recent solar flare storms that have been taking place and came to a remarkable conclusion. Read more on the following page about the NASA report that squarely shows the Leftist religion of Global Warming for the fraud that it really is…
Beautiful Photoshop NASA is as f**e as Barry Soetoro’s presidency!!!!
Always hated that term. Green House Gas, the # gas we felt with in the green house industry was to much Oxygen.
Joe Rodriguez sea ice doesn’t change sea levels…. just a heads up so you don’t use that against someone and look silly
Well right now there’s a dark spot on the sun as we speak. So prepare for a warmer summer. It’ll be all man’s fault.
Al should be arrested for FRAUD.
One of the purported signatures of anthropogenic CO2 is the carbon isotope ratio, C13/C12. The “natural” C13 content of CO2 is just over 1.1%. In contrast, the C13 content of the CO2 produced by burning of fossil fuels is claimed to be slightly smaller – just under 1.1%.
The concentration of C13 isn’t reported directly, it is given as “dC13”, which is computed as:
“dC13 = 1000* {([C13/C12]sample / [C13/C12]std ) – 1
Now, as we burn fossil fuels, the ratio of C13 to C12 is going down. From what I can find digging around on the Internet, some people think this is the signature of anthropogenic emissions. But if you examine the above equation, you will see that the C13 index that is reported can go down not only from decreasing C13 content, but also from an increasing C12 content (the other 98.9% of the CO2).
So, as the CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased, so has the C13 content…which, of course, makes sense when one realizes that fossil-fuel CO2 has only very slightly less C13 than “natural” CO2 (about 2.6% less in relative terms). If you add more CO2, whether from a natural or anthropogenic source, you are going to add more C13.
Significantly, note that the ratio of C13 variability to CO2 variability is EXACTLY THE SAME as that seen in the trends!
BOTTOM LINE: If the C13/C12 relationship during NATURAL inter-annual variability is the same as that found for the trends, how can people claim that the trend signal is MANMADE??
Love it!
New public liberal global cooling armageddon agenda starting in …3 …2 …1 … “we need a bazillion dollars cause the earth is going to freeze over in a year, this is science!!! … We also cant give any information on rate, or specific effect or anything else. But make the check out to cash please.”
Great
In CA. Ga. Have to buy winter clothing like Alaska ya!