Liberals persist in their strategy of flinging any number of questionable claims about gun control to get people behind it.
Just this week, MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry reached extra far when pushing her anti-Second Amendment agenda. In a panel discussion with former police officer and John Jay College professor Jon Shane, Harris-Perry argued that since some men use legally-purchased firearms to kill their wives, that all the guns in the country should be confiscated.
Yes, to anybody with the slightest smidgen of intelligence, this is an absurd argument, but the host fell back on it as if were some unbeatable trump card. Shane, who supports firearm ownership himself, wasn’t having it, refusing to waste the panel’s time on rebutting Harris-Perry’s point and dismissing it as the facile argument that it is.
What’s terrifying, however, is that many liberals will watch the discussion and come away thinking Harris-Perry has a point.
See video of the exchange on the next page:
Back ground check’s would be racist and would be fouled with incorrect data entered With the main number of one race with criminal background’s and the false data enter base only on race. it would almost strip that race of having the right to protect themselves. That is way there was never to be back ground check’s are any one stripped of their right.
Background check’s are unconstitutional infringement based on false data enter and racist ideological minnesinger of the entry of data used to strip one race of their Constitutional right done fetishistic by a racist are group of racist. No one are group get’s to pick an chose who has a right are who does not. It was never with in the powers of the Elected to make any rules, regulation, laws are to hinder, hamper, slow down are restrict put limits on We The Peoples rights; We The People secured the “blessing on to ourselves” for in case the Elected became tyrannical, there for with them having the vast interest in disarming any individual with in We The People government they were to refrain as they are disquieted and that makes them disqualified. The ” shall not be infringed” was put in the 2nd amendment pacifically to stop them form making any rules. regulation are law’s. ” However, the Supreme Court has now definitively held that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that weapon for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Moreover, this right applies not just to the federal government, but to states and municipalities as well.”. There for all rules regulations and law’s that have been passed are unconstitutional no matter who try’s to make them are uphold them rules,regulations are law’s that was made under Treasonous act’s. If right’s are granted by God then only God has the right to take, limit, rule, regulate, restrict, hamper any individual’s right no matter what God you believe in are not believe in. It is not in the hand’s of mankind to stop any individuals right’s.
Like Comment Share Make this hit main stream media talking point.
Apparently you have to be a certified moron to be in the media!
Only in the world of a socialist demoass.
Stupid libtard! Not to mention a racist!
what is wrong with this crazy woman?…why do they keep her around?…must be for the comedy , saying stupid things
you have to be a mistress of NBC to take her seriously
I want to tie this$#%&!@*to the back of my Harley and drag her until only the rope is left.
how about because getto thugs like to steal them
Oh , like women don’t shoot abusive ex’s ? Riiiiiiiight .
If we can take guns from the mentally ill please start with her