The liberal narrative about climate change is starting to fall apart thanks to conscientious scientists who have spoken out in face of pressure to toe the alarmist party line.
Dissenting from the supposed consensus of scientists who believe mankind is primarily responsible for climate change, Dr. Richard Lindzen of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology cast doubt on the very existence of said consensus. Indeed, the climatologist argues that the amount of scientists who believe climate change is man-made is much lower than the left and their allies in the media make it out to be.
Speaking to talk show host Bill Frezza on RealClear Radio Hour, Dr. Lindzen claimed that the idea that researchers overwhelmingly agree on climate change has been “propaganda” from the beginning. He said that the media helps push the narrative by saying scientists agree, but never bother telling people what exactly it is that they agree upon.
Since most Americans are unfamiliar with climate science, they feel pressured to accept the claims of personalities purporting to speak on behalf of scientists, allowing the climate change consensus myth to strengthen it’s hold in the minds of citizens.
See more on the next page:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/04/lindzen-in-newsweek/
O shut the$#%&!@*up
heads in the sand, open your eyes and look around, it’s real
Must be a “shill” for big oil. Or big Chemicals. Or big Pharma. Or big Insurance. Or big…… well, you get the picture.
Climate change to Obama has nothing to do with the weather but the political climate change.
Let’s say, hypothetically of course, that a president wants to institute marital law. How could you go about that? Maybe cut funding to the actual military that may choose to protect it’s citizens and increase funding for militarizing those entities that are in the president’s pocket. No one would suspect the EPA could help with that plan, right? http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2015/10/21/the-climate-change-liberation-army-and-u-s-environmental-protection-agency-epa-adventurism/#79ff2f2f41b9
I wouldn’t say it’s completely bull$#%&!@* BUT largely it is NOT global warming.rather, there is a shift of weather patterns for sure. it’s more geographic warming and cooling. Some areas are generally warmer than they used to be, and others cooler. for instance the South pole’s ice has grown quit a bit, while the North has shrunk. After that massive Earthquake in Japan that tilted Earth, OF COURSE weather will change slightly REGIONALLY. But there’s no horrible global scale warming trend that threatens our existence or anything. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/03/110316-japan-earthquake-shortened-days-earth-axis-spin-nasa-science/
One count them One volcanic eruption could create enough gases to make mans impact on the environment look like a drop of water in the Atlantic.
ONE count them one volcanic eruption could create enough gases to make humans impact on the environment look like a drop of water in the Atlantic.
silly guy turning his back on EVIDENCE not much of a scientist but, wait you guys dont believe in science; never mind