The liberal narrative about climate change is starting to fall apart thanks to conscientious scientists who have spoken out in face of pressure to toe the alarmist party line.
Dissenting from the supposed consensus of scientists who believe mankind is primarily responsible for climate change, Dr. Richard Lindzen of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology cast doubt on the very existence of said consensus. Indeed, the climatologist argues that the amount of scientists who believe climate change is man-made is much lower than the left and their allies in the media make it out to be.
Speaking to talk show host Bill Frezza on RealClear Radio Hour, Dr. Lindzen claimed that the idea that researchers overwhelmingly agree on climate change has been “propaganda” from the beginning. He said that the media helps push the narrative by saying scientists agree, but never bother telling people what exactly it is that they agree upon.
Since most Americans are unfamiliar with climate science, they feel pressured to accept the claims of personalities purporting to speak on behalf of scientists, allowing the climate change consensus myth to strengthen it’s hold in the minds of citizens.
See more on the next page:
What? A scientist actually looking at real data, without an agenda! He won’t be getting any “grants” will he, sad.
YOU KNOW…ITS ABOUT TIME!!! wow..Climant c**p and now the BSer in chief..how stupid are we?
Doris Fitch He is a business man it’s called networking. People do that.
On whose payroll? This is only a partisan political debate in the U.S.. The only people benefiting from denial is big oil & big coal. Must be where your stocks are!
LMAO!! This post has to be satire, right David? You want to talk about being wrong? How about all the alarmists’ predictions “scientists” who believe in anthropogenic global continuously make? How about their temperature and coastal water level predictions? Those old Psychic Hot Lines had a higher accuracy level than global warming proponents. And what about their insistence that 1997 was “the hottest year on record”, that is, until recently when they changed their minds and “adjusted” the temperature for that year down by 2.3 degrees? I mean, if they can’t even get current and recent temperatures right, why should anyone believe them?
So many lies are being told. So much fraudulent “Science”. So much fabrication that it’s hard to know when to start. It was warmer a thousand years ago than today. It was warmer during Ancient Egypt. The Lie mongers are using starting temperatures from a much cooler period to f**e Global warming. They are going from February to June.
The “97%’ was also concocted. If you asked a thousand Scientists in this arena if Man has an effect of Planetary temperature, they would give the correct answer of Yes. Then the Propagandists twisted this into Man is the cause of “Global Warming”. He has a small part but the Sun and the Planet itself are at least 95% of the total…..When you do the REAL Math you find that most of the :Environmental actions in this country have greatly increased Worldwide pollution. Instead of making widgets here with very strict pollution controls, they are now made with little, NO pollution controls in the 3d World….Thanks to Democrat intervention, Greater SE Asia now produces over half of the World’s air pollution even though they only have a small percentage of the World’s factories. For what the Democrats want to spend here to save less than 1% of this country’s pollution, we can save 10-15% Worldwide by cleaning up Greater SE Asia.
Consensus is not science; consensus is opinion only. Furthermore, science is replicatable and empirical. Climate change is neither.
Libtards are total b******t on all fronts……………..
Consensus is another word for heresy now I guess.