The liberal narrative about climate change is starting to fall apart thanks to conscientious scientists who have spoken out in face of pressure to toe the alarmist party line.
Dissenting from the supposed consensus of scientists who believe mankind is primarily responsible for climate change, Dr. Richard Lindzen of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology cast doubt on the very existence of said consensus. Indeed, the climatologist argues that the amount of scientists who believe climate change is man-made is much lower than the left and their allies in the media make it out to be.
Speaking to talk show host Bill Frezza on RealClear Radio Hour, Dr. Lindzen claimed that the idea that researchers overwhelmingly agree on climate change has been “propaganda” from the beginning. He said that the media helps push the narrative by saying scientists agree, but never bother telling people what exactly it is that they agree upon.
Since most Americans are unfamiliar with climate science, they feel pressured to accept the claims of personalities purporting to speak on behalf of scientists, allowing the climate change consensus myth to strengthen it’s hold in the minds of citizens.
See more on the next page:
It has always been a a sack of b.s.
well we all know that GOD CREATED HEAVEN AND EARTH AND WE KNOW THAT HE DESIGNED THE EARTH TO ROTATE AND EVERY FEW HUNDREDS OF YEARS THE EARTH GIVES A BREAK TO DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE WORLD SO AS GOD SEES FIT WE LIVE HERE
We all know climat change is a political ruse
I looked it up. It’s a very interesting point. Thanks for the information.
Climate change is GLOBAL warming and something that affects the entire world. http://www.livescience.com/18203-earth-missing-energy-lost.html
Lol you are just pitiful sheep. The climate changes every four months. Poor poor lost little sheep.
The way the “climate change” people put it, we should be seeing 70-80 degree North Pole temperatures within a few years. There will will be palm trees growing there.
When people are not presented with all the facts there’s usually an agenda that’s not based on the facts
As long as misguided liberals control the grant money, whoring scientists will claim anything to get the money, whether they really believe it or not. The real tragedy is how these scientists have skewed public opinion. The jury is still out on human impact on climate change, but the f**e data makes otherwise normal climate change look catastrophic. Anyone who claims the “science” is “final” or “conclusive,” like Obama, is spewing b******t and they clearly just don’t know any better.
http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/personfactsheet.php?id=17