As we proceed into an exciting new year and a potentially game-changing presidential administration, we find ourselves wading into new territory that raises challenging questions about our beliefs and ideas.
This of course isn’t necessarily a bad thing. After all, the mark of a good idea is that it has been subjected to numerous challenges and still remains intact. In fact, this is the essence of conservativism, respecting solid ideas that have stood the test of time while discarding ones that have been shown to be unfounded or dangerous. It is for this reason that we should be constantly evaluating the efficacy of our positions.
If we do not, we run the very serious risk of boxing ourselves into contradictory positions when two or more of our stances conflict with each other and giving a chance to characterize conservativism as a whole as the product of muddled thinking.
Turn to the next page for more info:
That totally stupid
Unbelievable. …
How sick make individuals responsible for their own actions. Every one chooses between right and wrong so they need to. Accept the consequences of their acts
Nope, cannot be allowed to do this!!
Then it time to sue the State.thats a no brainer let the State pay for the damages
Well, car dealerships are now liable for drunk driving deaths.
This is like holding auto manufacturers liable for dui’s. stupidest effing thing ever proposed.
So I guess the state of Missouri will be liable for enabling a different kind of douche bag in a road rage incident by building and maintaining a damned road? Slippery slope here folks.
So if a crazy robber comes in and starts shooting, does this mean the owners at fault?
Maybe we should start making cops responsible for deaths…. At least that would make sense.