As we proceed into an exciting new year and a potentially game-changing presidential administration, we find ourselves wading into new territory that raises challenging questions about our beliefs and ideas.
This of course isn’t necessarily a bad thing. After all, the mark of a good idea is that it has been subjected to numerous challenges and still remains intact. In fact, this is the essence of conservativism, respecting solid ideas that have stood the test of time while discarding ones that have been shown to be unfounded or dangerous. It is for this reason that we should be constantly evaluating the efficacy of our positions.
If we do not, we run the very serious risk of boxing ourselves into contradictory positions when two or more of our stances conflict with each other and giving a chance to characterize conservativism as a whole as the product of muddled thinking.
Turn to the next page for more info:
i support a national reciprocity for concealed carry and the 2nd ammendment. but if i own a place i get to control what goes in it. you have the right to vote with your feet if you dont like a busines’s policy. i will either not carry or most likely go somewhere else….
How about holding those holding the gun responsible
Thank you for this clear and precise account on what this click bait is obviously not explaining!
Great law! Would open up,where I shop a little….
Ok EVERY BUSINESS OWNER NEEDS TO LOCK AN LOAD AN PREPARE YOURSELF TO STOP IT AFTER ALL YOU HAVE THAT RIGHT IF THEY ARE GOING TO HOLD YOU RESPONSIBLE …
Correction got confuse on this issue statement below VERY WRONG SORRY
No, that’s telling the BLM’s people they can come in take what ever they want, while you’re on theirkness letting. Well b******t. A store Owner SHOULD should be able to defend his life as well as p otection
Ignorant!!!
B******t
This is backward isn’t it ?