As we proceed into an exciting new year and a potentially game-changing presidential administration, we find ourselves wading into new territory that raises challenging questions about our beliefs and ideas.
This of course isn’t necessarily a bad thing. After all, the mark of a good idea is that it has been subjected to numerous challenges and still remains intact. In fact, this is the essence of conservativism, respecting solid ideas that have stood the test of time while discarding ones that have been shown to be unfounded or dangerous. It is for this reason that we should be constantly evaluating the efficacy of our positions.
If we do not, we run the very serious risk of boxing ourselves into contradictory positions when two or more of our stances conflict with each other and giving a chance to characterize conservativism as a whole as the product of muddled thinking.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Oh goodie. Chicago should be bankrupt for years
I say we make POLITICIANS liable for gun violence!
If its about the assessment of blame to manufacturers that create something that results in injury or death of a person, start with tobacco companies or alcoholic beverage manufacturers. These two products alone (alcohol & tobacco) have a hand in more deaths than any other consumer/non-consumer product made, more than fire arms, knives automobiles or anything else imaginable.
that is wrong
Hummmmmm! Double edged sword! K
I would like for someone on FB to explain to me what gun violence is. I have owned guns for more than 50 years and I have never seen any gun violence around my house. So please, help understand what it is.
Now if you break into my house you will see some violence called Sam violence by use of my guns for sure.
Trump needs to go
Now WTH has Trump have to do with a Missouri Bill? Absolutely nothing.
Idgaf, everything done changed since the 20th. He needs to go a lot